The First Amendment Guarantees ALL Freedoms, including a Truthful Press
Obama's New "Dog ate my Homework Defense": "Romney Lied"
After watching the Socialists scramble to manage the message of how the Narcissist-in-Chief got his intellectual butt kicked in the first Presidential Debate - 2012, there is a common narrative evolving: "Mitt Romney lied so hard, and so proficiently that their candidate could not keep up with all of them." Fortunately, this replaces, "it was Moderator Jim Lehrer's fault," especially now that many respected observers are giving the PBS Anchor high marks for his role in one of the most substantive presidential debates in decades.
Candidate Obama's
"the dog ate my homework" approach to governing, and now his endless campaigning, manifests his administration's attempt to manage the message to his loyal followers, who are well renowned for their consistent inability to pay attention.
While many are critiquing the Candidate's awful performance to his existing in a bubble, insulated from the reality of his position and his failed policies, the same could be said about his fanatic followers, including the "media stooges," who draw a pay check as journalists, but their real job is to further Candidate Obama's Career as the most inept president in modern history.
Remarkably, this doesn't matter to the Candidate's totally incurious devotees, and explains their intellectual bubble of insufficient knowledge, as well.
Accordingly, when Candidate Obama, unleashes his well scripted, and teleprompter relayed, "Chicago style" political message, "My opponent is a liar," his less than attentive followers supped it up, and thus continue to parrot his embarrassing advocacy of his bubble world of surreal knowledge, as if it was truth - but their truth only.
You see, the problem in America today is not just a president, who is not very bright, and too narcissistic to understand the obvious, but a co-dependent electorate acting as enablers. These assorted legions of followers, who are obviously not capable of seeing what is occurring right before their eyes, and are willing culprits in the possible implosion of this Republic. They are the electorate, and their place in this Republic is as solid as those of us who do pay attention, and do know the bold lies of a unethical leader, who is bent on just one precept, one motive: I must remain in charge, irrespective of what I must do or say to remain as such.
So incredibly, we exist in today's America, where a president, who is no patron of the truth as nominal research well indicates, can promote his opponent is a liar, which is truly the ultimate lie, just to cover the immutable fact that, on Wednesday, October 3, 2012, Candidate Obama had his intellectual "ass kicked," and handed to him.
Candidate Obama has long demeaned the status of his office, but now, I sorely believe there may be no depths to which he will continue to sink until the election is over, and quite possibly well beyond.
Go Back
Candidate Obama's
"The Anointed One": Above.
While many are critiquing the Candidate's awful performance to his existing in a bubble, insulated from the reality of his position and his failed policies, the same could be said about his fanatic followers, including the "media stooges," who draw a pay check as journalists, but their real job is to further Candidate Obama's Career as the most inept president in modern history.
Remarkably, this doesn't matter to the Candidate's totally incurious devotees, and explains their intellectual bubble of insufficient knowledge, as well.
Accordingly, when Candidate Obama, unleashes his well scripted, and teleprompter relayed, "Chicago style" political message, "My opponent is a liar," his less than attentive followers supped it up, and thus continue to parrot his embarrassing advocacy of his bubble world of surreal knowledge, as if it was truth - but their truth only.
You see, the problem in America today is not just a president, who is not very bright, and too narcissistic to understand the obvious, but a co-dependent electorate acting as enablers. These assorted legions of followers, who are obviously not capable of seeing what is occurring right before their eyes, and are willing culprits in the possible implosion of this Republic. They are the electorate, and their place in this Republic is as solid as those of us who do pay attention, and do know the bold lies of a unethical leader, who is bent on just one precept, one motive: I must remain in charge, irrespective of what I must do or say to remain as such.
So incredibly, we exist in today's America, where a president, who is no patron of the truth as nominal research well indicates, can promote his opponent is a liar, which is truly the ultimate lie, just to cover the immutable fact that, on Wednesday, October 3, 2012, Candidate Obama had his intellectual "ass kicked," and handed to him.
Candidate Obama has long demeaned the status of his office, but now, I sorely believe there may be no depths to which he will continue to sink until the election is over, and quite possibly well beyond.
Who won the first Presidential Debate - 2012?
20% Barack Obama
71.11% Mitt Romney
8.89% Jim Lehrer
45 total vote(s) Voting has Ended!
Comments
|
Michael Varin said:
( October 17th, 2012 @ 1:04 pm )
Stan, Solyndra president and CEO Brian Harrison is a registered Republican. Although Solyndra's biggest private investor was affiliated with Kaiser (an Obama supporter), its second largest investor ($144 million) was a fund linked to the Walton family, of Wal-Mart renown, a major donor to Republicans. These facts have been widely reported. But probably not by your website, correct?
|
|
Solyndra: The money came from the Obama administration, even though they were under bankruptcy watch.
The Solyndra beneficiaries were Democrat contributors, not Republican. Follow the money. Those are the facts. Furthermore, one does not need to make multiple points that have little relative basis in facts, if you have the truth on your side. It's call Core values. |
|
|
I see, Stan. You make fewer points and are therefore more succinct. Sorry. I'm always forgetting how fond conservatives are of bumper sticker slogans and arguments.
Regarding Solyndra, you're pointing the finger at the wrong president. That's the norm with you. Follow the timeline, Stan: May 2005: Solyndra is founded to provide a cost-competitive alternative to silicon-based panels. July 2005: The Bush Administration signs the Energy Policy Act of 2005 into law, creating the 1703 loan guarantee program. December 2006: Solyndra Applies for a Loan Guarantee under the 1703 program. November 2007: Loan guarantee program is funded. Solyndra was one of 16 clean-tech companies deemed ready to move forward in the due diligence process. The Bush Administration DOE moves forward with funding. Get your facts straight, Stan. Just once. Please. |
|
|
Michael, you got your answer; I just did not understand your series of rants as anything cogent. Try stating the alleged lies more like this:
Candidate Obama stated that he would have the most transparent government in history, free of special interest, yet when he came to office, he brought a cadre of lobbyists as key staff, and turned the record stimulus package into a slush fund for Democrats - most notable was Solyndra that was in the process of going bankrupt as Obama lavished these Democrats with a half of a billion of the public's dollars, now the public's debt. Try being more succinct and much more substantive like this one truth, I expressed, as one of the multitudes of Obama Lies. |
|
|
That's what I thought..no answer. The guy lies constantly, Stan, and there's no denying it.
|
|
|
Michael, I've been in business for over 32 years, and I have no idea what you are talking about.
|
|
|
Stan, you he lied repeatedly. Here are the top ten. If you could defend any of these statements, please do.
1) “Get us energy independent, North American energy independent. That creates about 4 million jobs”. Romney’s plan for “energy independence” actually relies heavily on a study that assumes the U.S. continues with fuel efficiency standards set by the Obama administration. For instance, he uses Citigroup research based off the assumption that “‘the United States will continue with strict fuel economy standards that will lower its oil demand.” Since he promises to undo the Obama administration’s new fuel efficiency standards, he would cut oil consumption savings of 2 million barrels per day by 2025. 2) “I don’t have a $5 trillion tax cut. I don’t have a tax cut of a scale that you’re talking about.” A Tax Policy Center analysis of Romney’s proposal for a 20 percent across-the-board tax cut in all federal income tax rates, eliminating the Alternative Minimum Tax, eliminating the estate tax and other tax reductions, would reduce federal revenue $480 billion in 2015. This amounts to $5 trillion over the decade. 3) “My view is that we ought to provide tax relief to people in the middle class. But I’m not going to reduce the share of taxes paid by high-income people.” If Romney hopes to provide tax relief to the middle class, then his $5 trillion tax cut would add to the deficit. There are not enough deductions in the tax code that primarily benefit rich people to make his math work. 4) “My — my number-one principal is, there will be no tax cut that adds to the deficit. I want to underline that: no tax cut that adds to the deficit.” As the Tax Policy Center concluded, Romney’s plan can’t both exempt middle class families from tax cuts and remain revenue neutral. “He’s promised all these things and he can’t do them all. In order for him to cover the cost of his tax cut without adding to the deficit, he’d have to find a way to raise taxes on middle income people or people making less than $200,000 a year,” the Center found. 5) “I will not under any circumstances raise taxes on middle-income families. I will lower taxes on middle-income families. Now, you cite a study. There are six other studies that looked at the study you describe and say it’s completely wrong.” The studies Romney cites actually further prove that Romney would, in fact, have to raise taxes on the middle class if he were to keep his promise not to lose revenue with his tax rate reduction. 6) “I saw a study that came out today that said you’re going to raise taxes by $3,000 to $4,000 on middle-income families.” Romney is pointing to this study from the American Enterprise Institute. It actually found that rather than raise taxes to pay down the debt, the Obama administration’s policies — those contained directly in his budget — would reduce the share of taxes that go toward servicing the debt by $1,289.89 per taxpayer in the $100,000 to $200,000 range. 7) “And the reason is because small business pays that individual rate; 54 percent of America’s workers work in businesses that are taxed not at the corporate tax rate, but at the individual tax rate….97 percent of the businesses are not — not taxed at the 35 percent tax rate, they’re taxed at a lower rate. But those businesses that are in the last 3 percent of businesses happen to employ half — half of all the people who work in small business.” Far less than half of the people affected by the expiration of the upper income tax cuts get any of their income at all from a small businesses. And those people could very well be receiving speaking fees or book royalties, which qualify as “small business income” but don’t have a direct impact on job creation. It’s actually hard to find a small business who think that they will be hurt if the marginal tax rate on income earned above $250,000 per year is increased. 8 ) “Mr. President, all of the increase in natural gas and oil has happened on private land, not on government land. On government land, your administration has cut the number of permits and licenses in half.” Oil production from federal lands is higher, not lower: Production from federal lands is up slightly in 2011 when compared to 2007. And the oil and gas industry is sitting on 7,000 approved permits to drill, that it hasn’t begun exploring or developing. 9) “The president’s put it in place as much public debt — almost as much debt held by the public as all prior presidents combined.” This is not even close to being true. When Obama took office, the national debt stood at $10.626 trillion. Now the national debt is over $16 trillion. That $5.374 trillion increase is nowhere near as much debt as all the other presidents combined. 10) “That’s why the National Federation of Independent Businesses said your plan will kill 700,000 jobs. I don’t want to kill jobs in this environment.” That study, produced by a right-wing advocacy organization, doesn’t analyze what Obama has actually proposed. |
| Things That Make Noise in the Night, Part XV | Editorials, A Commissioner's View, Op-Ed & Politics, Bloodless Warfare: Politics | Agenda 2012: Public School Finance |
Home
Contact
About
Service Rates
Privacy Policy
Follow on Facebook
Subscribe to Newsletters
Rss Feed
Keywords
Eastern NC Now & ENC NOW © Copyright 1998-2024 All Rights Reserved.
