Certified: The Need to Repeal CON; Counter to their intent, Certificate of Need laws raise health care costs | Eastern NC Now

Enacted in 1978, North Carolina’s Certificate of Need (CON) law was one of many state CON laws adopted to comply with the federal Health Planning Resources Development Act of 1974.

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This article, by Jon Sanders, was originally published in John Locke Foundation's online edition.

    Enacted in 1978, North Carolina’s Certificate of Need (CON) law was one of many state CON laws adopted to comply with the federal Health Planning Resources Development Act of 1974. CON laws use central planning to try to reduce health care costs by keeping health care facilities from buying too much equipment, building too much capacity, and adding too many beds. Four decades’ worth of data and research into CON laws have produced a recurring theme in the research literature: CON laws fail to lower health care costs; if anything, they raise them. In 1987 Congress repealed the mandate, and subsequently 14 states (but not North Carolina) ended their CON regimes.

    North Carolina hosts one of the most restrictive CON programs in the country, regulating 25 different services. While patients and rural communities are negatively impacted by CON restrictions (especially the poor, elderly, and those with emergencies), existing hospitals and medical service providers reap the benefits of CON laws insulating them from competition. Fewer than one-fourth (23 out of 100) of counties in North Carolina have more than one hospital. Seventeen counties still have no hospital. The cost in money and time just to apply to provide health care services in this state can be too great for smaller providers. Limiting beds, services, and competitors leads to higher profits for existing providers. At the end of 2012 a legislative committee recommended several reforms to CON, including allowing “market driven competition in the provision of health services.” Bills based on those recommendations failed in 2013. State leaders could honor the intent behind CON — preventing unnecessary increases in health care costs — by repealing CON.

    Download PDF file: Certified: The Need to Repeal CON; Counter to their intent, Certificate of Need laws raise health care costs (642.1KB)
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published )
Enter Your Comment ( text only please )




NCSEN: In Like Flynn Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics A Tale of Two Bubbles


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Queen Garris has made a post on the Beaufort County GOP site that you should read. It is disloyal to conservative candiates key in the following: https://www.Facebook.Com/beaufortcountygop
another reason we need the SAVE America Act that Democrat politicians fear
Throughout the evening, the fireworks and other program events competed with uncooperative weather.
spending spree came from deceptively named "Inflation Reduction Act"
follows up on mass anti-immigration riots in Belfast, Northern Ireland

HbAD1

“Neville Singham has been a mechanism and funding arm of the Chinese Communist Party.”

HbAD2

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
wrongful stops and possible people tacking including cell phones

HbAD3

 
 
Back to Top