‘The View’ Loses It Over SCOTUS Taking Up Immunity Case, Accuses Court Of Plot To ‘Help Trump’ | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Virginia Kruta.

    The hosts of ABC's "The View" complained during Thursday's broadcast that the Supreme Court was plotting to "help Trump" by taking up the case regarding whether or not the former president was immune from prosecution.

    Cohost Joy Behar, ignoring the fact that the Supreme Court was already expediting the case at Special Counsel Jack Smith's request, questioned the timing of the case - asking specifically why they wouldn't take up the case "immediately."

    "They're not taking up this case immediately, so what's their motivation then?" Behar asked. "What is their motivation for not doing it right away?"

    "Unfortunately, some people are saying the motivation is that there are certain conservative justices that have been appointed by Trump that want to help him," cohost Sunny Hostin alleged, suggesting that the timing was an intentional move to make sure that Smith's case against Trump could not be completed prior to the presidential election in November.

    "Because we know the end result is - if this case is not resolved by the time of the election and he God forbid becomes the President of the United States - the Justice Department policy is that you can't indict nor put on trial a sitting president, right? And so it's his get out of jail free - but it's his get out of jail free card."


    "He could throw him in jail," Goldberg interrupted as Hostin finished. "No, no, no, I'm saying Biden could ..."

    WATCH:

ELECTION DENIALISMThe View calls the 2000 election case of Bush v Gore "the day democracy died" and "certainly an injustice."Back here, in reality, multiple recounts upheld that Bush did, in fact, win the election. pic.twitter.com/XAlDETLb7g

— Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) February 29, 2024

    Hostin followed that up with a reference to the 2000 presidential election and the Bush v. Gore case that came after Gore raised questions surrounding the Florida ballots and multiple recounts found in Bush's favor.

    "The Bush v. Gore case happened real quick," Hostin said, arguing that the Supreme Court knew how to truly expedite things when they chose to do so. "The Supreme Court knows how to work real fast."

    Behar got sidetracked by the mention of the 2000 election, saying of the Court's decision: "That's was the day democracy died."

    "Well ... it was certainly an injustice to many people," Hostin replied.

    "It was choking it," Goldberg added. "It was choking it."

poll#201

Considering what real news is available for all to witness, and in great specificity, should one pursue what is true outside of the channeled realm of the corrupt corporate /legacy media, and: Is Institutionalized Corruption real, and is it a hindrance to sustaining our Constitutional Republic now, and for future generations of American citizens?

  Yes

  No

  Not sure

447 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

poll#215

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

  No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

  Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

  "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

107 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?