Boebert: Kamala Harris Is Biden’s ‘Shrewd Insurance Policy’ Against Impeachment | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Joseph Curl.

    With Republicans taking over the House, investigations into President Joe Biden's administration are set to take off - as they should. After all, oversight is one of the key jobs of lawmakers as laid out in the Constitution.

    While there have been murmurs that Republicans might go so far as to impeach Biden, top party leaders have seemed to eschew the notion. But that was before a cache of classified documents was found in Biden's garage - and then kept hidden until after the midterm elections.

    But one GOP lawmaker says Biden has the perfect insurance policy to prevent his impeachment: Vice President Kamala Harris.

    "Joe Biden has failed the American people and he's keeping some members from calling for impeachment by having a historically unpopular vice president," Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-CO) said on Fox News.

    "Both have failed to faithfully uphold and execute the law, and both should be held fully accountable," she added. "Kamala Harris is Biden's shrewd insurance policy."

    In the last couple of months, Obama administration-era classified documents have been found at the Penn Biden Center in Washington, D.C., and at Biden's Wilmington, Delaware, home.

    But while there have been whispers that Republicans might seek to impeach Biden, Democrats and liberal news outlets are openly talking about dropping Harris from the 2024 ticket.

    Harris is just 58 and is the first female vice president - the highest-ranking female official in U.S. history. And she just happens to be the first black and first Asian American vice president. That checks a lot of boxes for identity-conscious Democrats.

    And still the talk persists. If Biden runs again, he should dump Harris, some stories say. Others say that if he doesn't run, the party should bail on her and pick someone else.

    The stories aren't wrong, per se. They do contain facts, like this from a September survey from Morning Consult: Just 28% of Democratic voters would vote for Harris in a Democratic presidential primary without Biden on the ballot, down from 33% in a poll last year. You don't win the White House with those numbers.

    Slate was one of the latest liberal sites to come out against Harris.

    "As Joe Biden weighs a run for re-election even as he becomes the first octogenarian U.S. president in history, he should think back on what it was like to watch the Harris campaign flame out," Christina Cauterucci wrote. "Harris, a proven dud of a presidential candidate who has done little to distinguish herself since is not a good choice for the Democrats' top billing. For his second term, should he seek one (he shouldn't!), Biden should tap someone else."

    Harris, it turns out, is surprisingly even more unpopular than her predecessors.

    "As the country has become more partisan, vice presidents have been less likely to enjoy broad support among the public. [Mike] Pence, for example, had a net favorability of roughly zero for much of his four years in the White House. Joe Biden, Dick Cheney, and Al Gore all began their tenures with higher ratings than Harris currently enjoys," the Los Angeles Times wrote last month.

    And Capitol Weekly openly derided Harris in an October piece headlined, "Memo to Democrats: Beware of Kamala Harris, in 2024 or beyond."

    "Despite her obvious intelligence, Harris just isn't very good, I'm sorry to say, either as a candidate or communicator," Democrat strategist Garry South wrote. "When it comes to Harris and 2024 - or beyond - Democrats would be wise to bear in mind the old time-honored caution, caveat emptor."

    The views expressed in this piece are the author's own and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.

In the face of a known scandal finally being revealed by the corrupt Legacy Media regarding Joe Biden, his Mishandling of Classified Documents and his long history of Influence Peddling to our Foreign Adversaries for Personal and Familial Profit: What do you believe the outcome will be in America's Leftist practice of a Two Tiered Justice System?
  Nothing will happen since the Democratic Socialist Left is corrupt to the core, and their non patriot ambitions are only the control of power.
  Justice WILL be served, but NOT without a tremendous fight by those willing to save the Republic.
  Why can't everyone else understand that the Left is special because we care so much for our own, especially the well being of the president and his family, especially Hunter.
  What difference does it make; I am a product of a failed public education system.
469 total vote(s)     What's your Opinion?

Go Back

Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )

‘That’s It, It’s Over’: Deion Sanders Warns His New Team To Respect Women Or Get The Boot Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Three Marines Arrested In Connection To January 6


Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better


illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.
Davidaon County student suspended for using correct legal term for those in country illegally


Lawmakers and privacy experts on both sides of the political spectrum are sounding the alarm on a provision in a spy powers reform bill that one senator described as one of the “most terrifying expansions of government surveillance” in history


Back to Top