North Carolinians Approve $2.8 Billion in New Local Debt | Eastern North Carolina Now

But All Five Local Sales Tax Proposals Were Defeated

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Brian Balfour.

    There were 26 local bond referenda across the state in this fall's election, totaling $2.8 billion. The success rate? 100%

    All 26 were approved easily, with the lowest approval rates in the mid-50s and several approval rates in the mid- to upper-70s. The stated purposes of the bonds were varied, but most dealt with either school construction and repair, affordable housing, road construction, or parks and recreation facilities.

    The Town of Wake Forest had the most bonds on the ballot, with four, totaling about $76 million.

    Wake County, unsurprisingly, tallied the highest dollar amount of bonds with $884 million: a $530 million bond for school construction and $353 million for Wake Tech Community College.

    City of Raleigh residents approved another $275 million for parks and recreation facilities.

    Wake County residents have seen their property taxes increased in 5 of the last 7 years, and they just voted themselves another one yesterday.

    Conversely, there were five counties with local sales tax increases on the ballot. The success rate of those? Zero percent.

    All five were defeated handily, by margins similar to the approval rates of the bonds.

    The disconnect is somewhat striking. Voters strongly supported more local debt, but equally as strongly opposed tax increases. Granted, local bond debt is typically financed through property tax hikes, and it is local sales tax increases that were rejected.

    However, the willing acceptance of increasing local debt while soundly rejecting local tax increases merits further examination.

    For many years I've been positing that there is a lack of public finance knowledge among voters:

    The fact that bonds are approved by voters so routinely while local tax increases continue to be defeated by wide margins provides more evidence to a theory of mine: many voters simply are not aware of what it means when they approve a bond. I believe many of them do not understand that they are authorizing an increase of their local government's debt. A debt that will have to be repaid - with interest - using their tax dollars.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




All NC’s new members of Congress come via state Senate John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics ‘Science in an Age of Unreason’


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

From Bedford Falls to Pottersville
Rasmussen asked citizenship question in demographics for first time
On Friday, in a case that the United States government and his employer have denounced as a sham, a Russian court found Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, the first U.S. journalist to face such a charge since Nicholas Daniloff in 1986, guilty of espionage
GovTrack ranked Kamala Harris the most liberal member of the US Senate
"The largest deportation effort in American history is going to have one hell of a co-pilot," one organization exclaimed.

HbAD1

"border czar" is supporter of wide open illegal immigration
There are alternatives. Our best and brightest should seek them out
It is time we elected new board members who will speak up for the people
Short of some unforeseen catastrophe Trump will win easily.

HbAD2

 
Back to Top