Federal Court Bars Biden Admin From Forcing Radical Gender Policy On States | Eastern North Carolina Now

A U.S. District Court in Tennessee has temporarily barred the Biden administration from enforcing a policy that would have required states to allow athletes who identify as transgender to play on the sports teams of the gender they identify with.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the The Daily Wire. The author of this post is Tim Meads.

    A U.S. District Court in Tennessee has temporarily barred the Biden administration from enforcing a policy that would have required states to allow athletes who identify as transgender to play on the sports teams of the gender they identify with.

    On Friday, U.S. District Judge Charles Atchley Jr. ruled in favor of 20 state attorneys general who sued the Biden administration in August 2021, the Associated Press reported. The attorneys general argued that two federal agencies - the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the U.S. Department of Education - were overstepping their mandate from Congress by crafting new guidance that would have trampled upon existing or future state gender laws.

    In addition to affecting transgender athletes, the Biden administration policy would have allowed individuals who identify as transgender to enter locker rooms and use bathrooms of the opposite biological sex.

    In June 2021, DOE said that discrimination based on their gender identity would be a violation of Title IX. The EEOC also issued new guidance for private businesses. Many of these states represented in the lawsuit had crafted laws that ran afoul of those federal policies and argued that the court needed to issue a temporary injunction on the federal guidance until their lawsuit could make its way through the system.

    "As demonstrated above, the harm alleged by Plaintiff States is already occurring - their sovereign power to enforce their own legal code is hampered by the issuance of Defendants' guidance and they face substantial pressure to change their state laws as a result," Atchley wrote in his ruling on Friday.

    Tennessee's Attorney General Herbert Slatery led the lawsuit and claimed that the justification for DOE's and EEOC's guidance rested on a false interpretation of Bostock v. Clayton County, which declared that it was discriminatory for a private business to fire or hire somebody based on their gender identity or sexual orientation under Title VII.

    "These agencies also have misconstrued the Supreme Court's Bostock decision by claiming its prohibition of discrimination applies to locker rooms, showers, and bathrooms under Title IX and Title VII and biological men who identify as women competing in women's sports, when the Supreme Court specifically said it was not deciding those issues in Bostock," Slatery argued in August 2021 lawsuit, Courthouse News reported at the time.

    The lawsuit also said that the Biden administration "purports to resolve highly controversial and localized issues such as ... whether individuals may be compelled to use another person's preferred pronouns. But the agencies have no authority to resolve those sensitive questions, let alone to do so by executive fiat without providing any opportunity for public participation."

    The attorneys general argued that the agencies in question were "usurping authority that properly belongs to Congress, the States, and the people and to eliminate the nationwide confusion and upheaval that the agencies' recent guidance has inflicted on States and other regulated entities."

    Prior to the injunction, DOE could have enacted various sanctions on schools or colleges that did not comply with their transgender guidance. Ultimately, the attorneys general challenging the administration want the court to declare the policies "invalid and unlawful and to prohibit their enforcement."

    The Biden administration has recently suffered major setbacks when attempting to enforce new policies on states in other domestic issues.

    In June, the Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in West Virginia v. The Environmental Protection Agency that the EPA lacked the authority to curb greenhouse gases in order to bring about a transition away from coal energy throughout the country because it was not specifically granted that power by Congress.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




‘Historic’: Republicans Gain Voter Registration Advantage In Another State For The First Time Ever Daily Wire, Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Jill Biden Reveals Frustrations To Donors: ‘So Many Things Thrown His Way’: Report


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The existing School Board should vote to put this project on hold until new Board is seated
At least one person was shot and killed during an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump on Saturday at a political rally in Pennsylvania in which the suspected gunman was also “neutralized,” according to the U.S. Secret Service.
As everyone now knows, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling to grant presidents immunity for "official acts" has given Donald Trump unlimited power to do literally anything he wants with zero consequences whatsoever.

HbAD1

President Joe Biden formally rejected on Monday a bill in Congress that would require individuals to show proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in elections for federal office.
Watch and be sensitive to the events which will possibly unfold in the coming days.

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top