How Not to Lower Gas Prices | Eastern North Carolina Now

Everybody is feeling pain at the gas pump. Politicians are coming up with proposals to try to provide relief, but few would actually bring prices back down.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Brian Balfour.

    Everybody is feeling pain at the gas pump. Politicians are coming up with proposals to try to provide relief, but few would actually bring prices back down.

    More generally, price inflation is a result of Federal Reserve money printing, mostly to finance government deficit spending.

    But specific to gas prices, how can those prices be brought back down?

    Basic Econ 101 tells us: to lower the price of a good, all else being equal, either the demand for the good needs to fall, or the supply of it must increase (or some combination of both).

    Two recent proposals would do neither; and if anything, would drive gas prices up still higher.

    President Biden recently floated the idea of a gas tax holiday. The measure would suspend the 18 cents per gallon federal gas tax for the summer months. This move would do nothing to increase the supply of gas - such a temporary measure will not inspire oil refineries and others to invest in increased supply. And it certainly would not suppress demand. And if anything, gas retailers would be incentivized to raise their prices enough to bring them back up to where they were before the tax holiday.

    Moreover, estimates project that the gas tax holiday would reduce government revenue by $10 billion. Unless there is an offsetting reduction in government infrastructure spending of $10 billion (highly unlikely), that revenue gap will need to be made up for with deficit spending, much if not all would be financed by Federal Reserve money printing.

    In North Carolina, state Senate Democrats have introduced a bill that would send every North Carolina adult with a driver's license $200. Surely North Carolinians would welcome the money, but it would do nothing to bring down gas prices, and if anything would push them up. Sending an estimated $1.3 billion to drivers across the state would serve to subsidize demand for gas, putting upward pressure on prices. And being a one-time subsidy, there would be no incentive for producers to increase supply.

    With the Biden administration appearing to stubbornly continue to refuse to ease restrictions in order to encourage more supply, the best hope for gas prices to fall again looks to be decreased demand. Sadly, the surest way to decrease demand in a significant manner would come in the form of a recession, which appears to be more and more likely.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Redistricting plaintiffs urge N.C. Supreme Court to hear new arguments as early as September John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Supreme Court Supports Right for General Assembly to Intervene in Voter ID Case


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government

HbAD1

Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.
Smartmatic was at center of voting machine controversy in US 2020 election
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Shooter was identified on the roof with a weapon with enough time to stop him...but, officers were not prepared to access the roof

HbAD2

 
Back to Top