Did You Know? Results of New Campus Expression Survey | Eastern North Carolina Now

Heterodox Academy recently released findings from its Campus Expression Survey, which sheds light on how comfortable students feel discussing hot-button issues on campus.

ENCNow
    Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of The James G. Martin Center. The author of this post is Shannon Watkins.

    Heterodox Academy recently released findings from its Campus Expression Survey, which sheds light on how comfortable students feel discussing hot-button issues on campus.

    Here are some of the survey's key findings:

    Overall, there is a lot of reluctance to discuss controversial topics.

    60 percent of college students expressed reluctance to discuss at least one controversial topic- with students most reluctant to discuss politics (39.5 percent), followed by religion (31.8 percent), and race (27.5 percent).

    Although a majority of surveyed students (88 percent) agreed that colleges should foster open and civil discourse, 63 percent stated that the climate on their campuses was not conducive to free expression.

    In-person vs. online learning affects discourse.

    There seems to be a close connection between in-person learning and higher-quality interactions.

    In 2020, only 11 percent of surveyed students were attending in-person classes. That drastically changed in 2021, when 63 percent of students attended fully or primarily online classes. Notably, students said they had more high-quality interactions with their peers in 2021. The report states, "Students who reported having lower-quality interactions with other students were more reluctant to discuss controversial topics."

    Students' race and political affiliation play a significant role in their comfort level in discussing contentious issues.

    The report notes, "Republican and Independent students were more reluctant to discuss controversial topics compared with Democrat students."

    In comparison with all other races, Asian and white students were more hesitant to discuss hot-button topics.

    There were some factors that didn't influence students' willingness to engage in difficult conversations.

    The following characteristics didn't influence students one way or the other:

  • Geographic location of school
  • Area of academic focus
  • Family income level
  • Year in school (freshman, senior)

    Interestingly, the report notes, "Men were about as reluctant to discuss gender (24%) as women (23%)."

    What is the most common reason for student reluctance to discuss controversial issues?

    According to the report, it is fear of peer criticism. The survey found that 56 percent of students self-censored out of fear of what their peers might say after class. This is similar to the findings of a UNC-Chapel Hill survey on campus free expression, which also found that peer judgment was a significant factor in self-censorship.

    Read more about the survey's findings here.

    Shannon Watkins is associate editor at the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal
Go Back

HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview

HbAD1

If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government
Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top