Lawmakers OK regulatory sandbox bill to boost innovation in NC financial sector | Eastern North Carolina Now

A unanimous vote in the N.C. House means a “regulatory sandbox” bill is on its way to Gov. Roy Cooper. The new “sandbox” would waive certain obstacles for a trial period for fast-emerging financial and insurance products and services.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal. The author of this post is CJ Staff.



    A unanimous vote in the N.C. House means a "regulatory sandbox" bill is on its way to Gov. Roy Cooper. The new "sandbox" would waive certain obstacles for a trial period for fast-emerging financial and insurance products and services.

    The 111-0 vote Thursday in the state House followed a 49-0 vote Wednesday in the Senate.

    "In setting up a regulatory sandbox we can signal to a growing group of entrepreneurs that North Carolina is committed to fin-tech innovation," Jordan Roberts, government affairs associate for the John Locke Foundation, said in comments to the House Finance Committee when the bill was introduced in June.

    House Bill 624 would create a regulatory sandbox similar to one authorized in Arizona in 2018. At least five other states have since adopted similar laws, and some half a dozen are considering such bills this year in an effort to remain agile and competitive in an increasingly digital world.

    "The idea originated in the United Kingdom in 2014 specifically for financial tech companies," said Jon Sanders, Locke's senior fellow in regulatory studies. "By 2018 it was considered a huge success, and regulatory sandboxes started cropping up around the world (Singapore, Abu Dhabi, Denmark, Hong Kong, etc.) as well as the U.S. (Arizona, Utah, and Wyoming). South Korea built its regulatory sandbox for every industry, and Utah, whose regulatory sandbox started with finance and insurance, just did the same."

    H.B. 642 would apply only to the finance and insurance industries in North Carolina. Among other changes, the bill would create a new Innovation Council to market the program and seek and review applications. The council would evaluate applications based on level of innovation, potential consumer risks, level of consumer protection and complaint resolutions in place, and level of business plan and capital. It would then make recommendations and pass them along to the state agencies ultimately responsible for the final decision.

    "This bill would keep North Carolina as a regional and national leader for business by encouraging companies with innovative finance and insurance products to test them right here in North Carolina," said Roberts in an interview. "The sandbox approach ensures the right balance of consumer choice and protection."
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




N.C. House Freedom Caucus plans to inspect Durham County voting machines Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics GOP goes AOC; votes to advance socialism in HB951


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government

HbAD1

Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.
Smartmatic was at center of voting machine controversy in US 2020 election
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Shooter was identified on the roof with a weapon with enough time to stop him...but, officers were not prepared to access the roof

HbAD2

 
Back to Top