Conservatives Are Not Alone in Opposing Unchecked Majorities | Eastern North Carolina Now

Charles Cooke of National Review Online challenges another canard from the political left.

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the John Locke Foundation. The author of this post is Mitch Kokai.

    Charles Cooke of National Review Online challenges another canard from the political left.

  • Jonathan Chait tries once again to cast Rand Paul and Mike Lee's entirely mainstream skepticism toward unchecked majoritarianism as something sinister and unusual. The ideas that Paul and Lee have expressed, Chait writes, are common on the Right, and, indeed, "are not identified solely with the most extreme or Trumpy conservatives," but "have frequently been articulated by conservatives who express deep personal animosity toward Donald Trump and his cultists."
  • Yeah, they have. And do you know who else is skeptical of unchecked majoritarianism?
  • Everyone. ...
  • ... How, I wonder, does Chait account for the counter-majoritarian decisions that his own side strongly favors? The anti-abortion laws that Roe v. Wade overturned were not the product of state governments being "destroyed by violent insurrection." They were the product of democracy. The laws that protected traditional marriage were not the product of state governments being "destroyed by violent insurrection." They were the product of democracy - and, in several cases, popular referenda. The laws permitting school prayer were not the product of state governments being "destroyed by violent insurrection." They were the product of democracy.
  • All of these laws were swept away despite that democracy. Why? Because they were held to be in violation of the Constitution's protection of minority rights. (In my view, these cases were incorrectly decided, but my objection is to the specifics of those cases rather than to the existence of judicial review). If Jonathan Chait were to call up a Democratic senator at random this afternoon and ask whether he thinks that this was a good thing, that Democratic senator would likely end up sounding very much like Rand Paul. I wonder: Is that an indictment of the Democratic party, its voters, and the broader progressive movement? Or does it only work the other way around?

Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Climate Alarmists Like Luxury Beachfront Property John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Inflation roars as Biden fiddles


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Senate race also within margin of error in New Mexico
You reckon all those lobbyists Health Care sends to Raleigh have anything to do with this debacle?
Former President Donald Trump’s legal team filed documents in court on Thursday seeking to have Judge Arthur Engoron thrown off the civil fraud case against Trump in New York after they discovered that he allegedly engaged in “prohibited communications” with an outside party about the case.
crime on the rise in US from Biden open borders from pickpocketing to rape and murder

HbAD1

One would be hard-pressed to find a poorer example of school planning
Parts of the gag order against former President Donald Trump in his New York hush money case were lifted by Judge Juan Merchan on Tuesday, just two days before Trump is set to square off against President Joe Biden in the first debate of the election season.

HbAD2

1,500 Tajiks have come in under Biden, compared to 26 over past 14 years
rarely used procedure can go around Garland refusing to prosecute himself
'I am a white male and that’s not who they’re looking to promote at the moment,' the man told an undercover journalist.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top