More Than You Pay For | Eastern North Carolina Now

A few days ago I wrote that the state spending plan just approved by the North Carolina General Assembly was the right and responsible thing to do given current fiscal and economic realities.

ENCNow
   Publisher's note: The article below appeared in John Hood's daily column in his publication, the Carolina Journal, which, because of Author / Publisher Hood, is inextricably linked to the John Locke Foundation.

    RALEIGH     A few days ago I wrote that the state spending plan just approved by the North Carolina General Assembly was the right and responsible thing to do given current fiscal and economic realities. I believe that because I don't equate the amount of government spending with the value of government services. Rather than raising taxes to fund more government, I think North Carolina ought to be raising the productivity of the government we already have.

    Others do tend to equate the amount of spending with the value of services, however. "You get what you pay for," they insist. That's quite wrong, actually. If we always and only got "what we paid for," productivity would never rise and overall increases in the standard of living would never be possible. That is, if goods or services always exchanged for goods or services of exactly the same value, there would be no such thing as economic progress.

    In the real world, there
John Hood
is no objective value to any good or service. There is no terrestrial force, no magical inquisitor who can read our minds, inhabit our senses, and come up with a universal measurement of value. Instead, we all place our own value on the goods and services we want. Economic value is subjective, in other words - which offers the prospect of mutually beneficial deals.

    If I am willing to pay you $50 to mow my lawn, that does not mean that I equate the two. I actually value having my lawn mowed more than the $50 in my pocket. If you take the deal, that means that you value the $50 more than your cost to do the job in sweat, equipment, and lost free time. The transaction makes us both better off. In effect, I am letting you mow my lawn because my time would be more productively spent on some other task.

    Productivity comes from figuring out how to produce more value to consumers for any given level of input. It usually stems from investments in plant and equipment (physical capital), better work skills (human capital), or some creative rearrangement of inputs to increase efficiency or consumer satisfaction.

    In the private sector, there are strong incentives for both owners and users of capital to pursue higher productivity. When workers are more productive, they tend to earn more income. When entrepreneurs improve the productivity of their firms, they either get higher wages or better investment returns.

    In government, however, the incentive to pursue productivity isn't as strong. State agencies and departments can't lose market share to competitors if they fail to innovate. Even in cases where state-assisted institutions do compete with the private sector - public universities, for example - the large share of their budgets derived from direct appropriations rather than user fees gives them an artificial advantage and weakens their incentives to promote productivity.

    That's one reason why formal fiscal constraints such as balanced-budget rules, referendum requirements, and spending caps are essential to achieving better returns on taxpayer investment. In the absence of true market competition, they force public-sector managers to find new ways to deliver services at a lower unit cost.

    Let's stick with the higher education example. Since the start of the Great Recession, the UNC system has had its state appropriation reduced several times. While it remains one of the most generously subsidized university systems in the country, UNC's budgets are certainly tighter than they used to be. Managers have had to respond by becoming more productive.

    As the Triangle Business Journal reports, one response has been to require tenured and tenure-track professors to teach more courses. At N.C. State, credit hours taught by such faculty rose more than 15 percent from 2008 to 2011. There was a 22 percent increase at N.C. Central. At UNC-Chapel Hill, credit hours per professor stayed about the same but the number of separate classes taught has gone up.

    Productivity is the name of the game. North Carolina governments need to continue improving how well they play it.

    Hood is president of the John Locke Foundation and author of Our Best Foot Forward: An Investment Plan for North Carolina's Economic Recovery.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Arthur Williams Sinks to a New Low: Now as a Democrat-switched-to-Republican Candidate for NC House John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics It's all about power


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview

HbAD1

If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government
Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top