Fact Check: Conservative Tax Reforms Did Not Have ‘Harsh Consequences’ on State Revenue | Eastern North Carolina Now

The progressive left in North Carolina has for years attempted to paint a narrative that the conservative tax reforms over the last several years have starved state government of funding, and have left budgets “cut to the bone.”

ENCNow
Publisher's Note: This post appears here courtesy of the Civitas Institute. The author of this post is Brian Balfour.

    The progressive left in North Carolina has for years attempted to paint a narrative that the conservative tax reforms over the last several years have starved state government of funding, and have left budgets "cut to the bone."

    Perhaps the latest such example was this NC Policy Watch article that proclaimed "there are harsh consequences to cutting taxes for the rich and big corporations."

    Such criticism ignores the benefits of tax cuts in the form of job and income growth, while ignoring the negative consequences of higher taxes; pretending instead that changes in tax rates have no impact on job creation and investment. Such analysis, however, is beyond the scope of this article.

    The purpose of this post is to present tax revenue trends to evaluate the claims that tax reform has had "harsh consequences" on state tax revenue.

    By far the most significant changes to the state tax code occurred in 2013. It makes sense, then, to compare tax revenue trends in the years preceding and following FY 2013-14.

    As you can see in the chart below, North Carolina General Fund tax revenue grew at a faster pace following the tax reforms compared to before the reforms.

    From FY 2009-10 to FY 2012-13, tax revenue grew by 9.3%, and from FY 2014-15 to FY 2017-18, revenue grew at a faster 10.8% pace.

    Because of the onset of the Great Recession, which caused tax revenue to dramatically fall by roughly 11% in FY 2008-09, we used FY 2009-10 as the baseline for the pre- tax reform period. The tax reforms were passed in 2013 and largely went into effect on Jan. 1, 2014, so the fiscal year 2013-14 was a transition year, with half of it before and half after the tax cuts. For this reason, we chose FY 2014-15, the first full year with the reforms in effect, as the baseline.

    This is admittedly a fairly small sample size, however, it certainly is enough to call into question the narrative that the 2013 — and subsequent — tax reforms have had "harsh consequences" on state tax revenue.

    Indeed, the review shows that after tax reform, revenue has increased at a faster pace than in the years prior to reform.

    Moreover, for FY 2018-19, tax revenue increased another 5.3% over FY 2017-18, a healthy clip higher than all but one annual revenue increase in the six years prior to reform.

    Did tax reforms over the past several years starve the state budget of revenue? A look at the data tells us no; in fact tax revenue grew at a faster pace than in the years immediately prior to reform.

    General Fund revenue data sources:

    Figures up to FY 2017-18: Governor's Recommended Budget for 2019-21; Appendix Table 1A; available online at: https://files.nc.gov/ncosbm/documents/files/REC2019-21_AppendixTables.pdf

    For figures after FY 2017-18, North Carolina Office of the State Controller, General Fund Monthly Reports for June 2019 and June 2020. Available online at: https://www.osc.nc.gov/public-information/reports/general-fund-monthly-reports

    General Fund tax revenue includes the three major sources, which are: personal income, state sales, and corporate income taxes. Other sources include franchise tax, insurance tax, tobacco tax, along with several other small sources of tax revenue.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Blueprints for Reform Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Ted Cruz Speaks Out After Trump Adds Him To Supreme Court Shortlist


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview

HbAD1

If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government
Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top