Supreme Court Faces Another Appeal From Church Facing COVID-19 Restrictions

Latest Polls (view all)

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

98.11% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

0.94% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

0.94% "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

Click Here to Vote
106 Vote(s)

View all Polls

Supreme Court Faces Another Appeal From Church Facing COVID-19 Restrictions

Published: Wednesday, August 5th, 2020 @ 4:03 am
By: John Locke Foundation ( More Entries )

Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

Nicholas Rowan of the Washington Examiner highlights a First Amendment appeal to the nation's highest court.

A Chicago church on Tuesday announced its intentions to appeal to the Supreme Court, following an unfavorable ruling from an Illinois federal appeals court upholding Gov. J.B. Pritzker's worship ban.
The church, Elim Romanian Pentecostal, has been embroiled in a legal war with Chicago and the state of Illinois since early May when it began opposing the 10-person limit on in-person services. Chicago police issued citations to members of the church after they persisted in defiance of Pritzker's and Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot's orders.
Cristian Ionescu, the church's pastor, told the Chicago Sun-Times at the time that the church was not engaged in "a rebellion for the sake of rebellion."
"We feel that we are discriminated against," Ionescu said. "We follow the same rules as other places that are also considered essential, and yet we cannot have more than 10 people in a service, which is ridiculous."
The case, if the Supreme Court accepts it, will be the first coronavirus church closure case to reach the highest court. Since May, the Supreme Court has rejected two emergency injunctions filed by churches in California and Nevada. Religious liberty experts speculate that these rejections, issued as 5-4 decisions with Chief Justice John Roberts as the swing vote, were delivered because of Roberts's dislike for granting injunctions in any circumstance.
But the case brought forward by Elim Romanian is different since it is not asking for an injunction, according to Liberty Counsel Chairman Mat Staver, the head of the legal nonprofit group representing the church. By filing with the Supreme Court, he said, Liberty Counsel hopes to force the justices into resolving a now long-running dispute. Citing a decision against churches in California and a decision in favor of churches in Kentucky, Staver concluded that the Supreme Court is in a position to settle the issue definitively.

Go Back