Panning Twitter’s Fact-Check Policy | Eastern North Carolina Now

David Harsanyi explains at National Review Online why Twitter’s new fact checks for high-profile tweets amount to “folly.”

ENCNow
Publisher's note: The author of this post is Mitch Kokai for the John Locke Foundation.

    David Harsanyi explains at National Review Online why Twitter's new fact checks for high-profile tweets amount to "folly."

  • No American, not even the president, has an inherent right to a social-media account. Tech companies such as Facebook and Twitter are free to ban any user they see fit. They're free to fact-check anyone they want, to create a framework of acceptable speech, and to enforce their policies either consistently or capriciously. They're free to accuse Donald Trump - and only Trump, if they see fit - of being a liar. They're free to do all of these things.
  • Even if they shouldn't. ...
  • ... It's a mistake for any platform to drop its neutral stance and take on fact-checking duties, a task that's going to be impossible to accomplish either objectively or effectively. It's going to corrode trust in the brand, but it won't change a single mind.
  • Once Twitter begins tagging some tweets and not others with "what you need to know," it will be staking out partisan positions. The Trump tweets that precipitated its first election-related fact-check are a good example of this. It would have been far more reasonable for the social-media giant to label Trump's ugly and libelous tweets about Joe Scarborough as misleading. Instead, Twitter decided to inaugurate its policy by alleging that Trump had dishonestly claimed that mail-in ballots would lead to "a Rigged Election."
  • Even if this contention were entirely baseless, it would be as untrue as saying Russia rigged the election - a claim that politicians such as Adam Schiff and Nancy Pelosi, along with most major media outlets, have been making for years. But while the president's rhetoric about voting is debatable, it is also well within the normal parameters of contemporary political discourse.

    Follow Carolina Journal Online's continuing coverage of North Carolina's response to the COVID-19 pandemic HERE.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




A War Against ‘Normal’ John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Virtual Charter School Has Received 3,100 Applications for 403 Available Seats


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The existing School Board should vote to put this project on hold until new Board is seated
At least one person was shot and killed during an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump on Saturday at a political rally in Pennsylvania in which the suspected gunman was also “neutralized,” according to the U.S. Secret Service.
As everyone now knows, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling to grant presidents immunity for "official acts" has given Donald Trump unlimited power to do literally anything he wants with zero consequences whatsoever.
President Joe Biden formally rejected on Monday a bill in Congress that would require individuals to show proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in elections for federal office.
Watch and be sensitive to the events which will possibly unfold in the coming days.

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
majority of board member are rubberstamps for liberal superintendant
like the old Soviet Union, Biden put DEI political officers in the military
ssick perverts running Deere sponsored homosexual event for 3 year olds

HbAD2

appoints new pro-cnesorship White House official
Those with access to President Joe Biden behind closed doors say that his condition is deteriorating at an accelerated rate

HbAD3

 
Back to Top