Trump Increases Pressure on Venezuela, Weighs Options | Eastern North Carolina Now

The U.S. has deployed significant assets in the region.

ENCNow
Publisher's note: This post appears here courtesy of the LifeZette, and written by Polizette Staff.

    The U.S. military, under the direction of President Trump, as of Tuesday has moved a sizable amount of military assets into the Caribbean and areas immediately adjacent to Venezuela.

    U.S. Army, Marine, Navy, Coast Guard, and other forces are there to interdict drugs flowing to the U.S. from Venezuela. U.S. courts have recently indicted Venezuelan dictator Nicolas Maduro and his cronies for drug offenses.

    But the deployment is also in indirect support of the effort to oust Maduro from office. His regime is not recognized by the U.S. and many allied nations. The legitimate government is led by Juan Guaido, the former President of the National Assembly.

    Many are comparing this buildup to the preliminary moves against Panamanian dictator and drug runner Manuel Noriega in 1989. Granted, the U.S. operation to topple Noreiga was swift and efficient. However, expect no overt move like that from Trump. He has long been on the record as against foreign military adventures like the war in Iraq.

    The Venezuelans would have to mightily provoke Trump into serious action. Given the president did not move in strength against Iran, though he was on the brink of doing so, after the Iranians fired missiles at our troops in Iraq and harassed ships in the Persian Gulf, it is unlikely he would proceed with a large military intervention in South America alone and without a quick exit plan.

    If, on the other hand, he had allied assistance, and the Colombians and Brazilians would probably give it, then a rollback of Marxism in the hemisphere, somewhat like the Grenada operation (though one would hope better executed) could transpire.

    The Venezuelan people would welcome it, but would wait it out in their homes to see who won the conflict. Maduro's army would likely disintegrate in the face of such an onslaught. Even with that rosy eventual outcome Trump would still not be a fan of military intervention. Recent history bears out his views.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Is the State-Run Lottery Essential Business? Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics White House Press Secretary Grisham Rejoins First Lady’s Office


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The existing School Board should vote to put this project on hold until new Board is seated
At least one person was shot and killed during an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump on Saturday at a political rally in Pennsylvania in which the suspected gunman was also “neutralized,” according to the U.S. Secret Service.
As everyone now knows, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling to grant presidents immunity for "official acts" has given Donald Trump unlimited power to do literally anything he wants with zero consequences whatsoever.
President Joe Biden formally rejected on Monday a bill in Congress that would require individuals to show proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in elections for federal office.
Watch and be sensitive to the events which will possibly unfold in the coming days.

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
majority of board member are rubberstamps for liberal superintendant
like the old Soviet Union, Biden put DEI political officers in the military
ssick perverts running Deere sponsored homosexual event for 3 year olds

HbAD2

appoints new pro-cnesorship White House official
Those with access to President Joe Biden behind closed doors say that his condition is deteriorating at an accelerated rate

HbAD3

 
Back to Top