Cooper Has Taken Extreme Positions | Eastern North Carolina Now

Although Cooper’s defenders have tried to suggest otherwise, the governor has essentially issued an ultimatum: no new budget without Medicaid expansion.

ENCNow
Publisher's note: This post appears here courtesy of the Carolina Journal, and written by John Hood.

Gov. Roy Cooper, with First Lady Kristen Cooper at his side, helped rally teachers at the May 1, 2019, march on Raleigh. | Photo: Don Carrington/Carolina Journal

    Roy Cooper didn't run for governor in 2016 as a hard-left progressive. He won the election - one of the narrowest gubernatorial contests in American history - by convincing ticket-splitters who voted for Donald Trump and Richard Burr that Cooper would be a reasonable, consensus-building leader in Raleigh.

    It wasn't an unrealistic expectation. Cooper has been a public servant for decades, first in the state house and senate and later as attorney general for 16 years. He has a track record. If you used his votes and policies before 2016 to place him on a political gridiron, he'd have been somewhere around the blue team's 35- or 40-yard line.

    As governor, however, Cooper hasn't come close to fulfilling that promise. He's wandered leftward.

    He's also kept a relatively low profile, which wasn't hard to do given ongoing public fascination with the circus in Washington. As a result, Cooper isn't exactly unpopular. But nearly a quarter of voters have mixed or unfixed views about him. As voters begin tuning into the 2020 campaign, Republicans will seek to define him as a left-wing ideologue, not a pragmatist.

    They will point out, for example, that regardless of how the current budget impasse is resolved, Cooper was willing to make pay raises for teachers and state employees conditional on expanding Medicaid. Supportive politicians of both parties have badly misread polls about Medicaid expansion. I won't restate the policy argument here. I'll simply point out that it isn't a top voting issue for most North Carolinians, especially those critical few voters who still split their tickets.

    Large numbers of voters are public employees, the family members of public employees, or receive the services provided by public employees. Again, setting aside the merits of the case, such voters prioritize pay raises for public employees. They don't see Medicaid the same way.

    Although Cooper's defenders have tried to suggest otherwise, the governor has essentially issued an ultimatum: no new budget without Medicaid expansion. Much of state government will continue to operate normally under previously authorized spending levels. So, the most-significant effect of the budget impasse is that teachers and state employees aren't getting raises. The ultimatum, then, is really no pay raises without Medicaid expansion. That's an extreme position.

    Want something even more extreme? A couple of weeks ago, Gov. Cooper submitted a brief in a case in which the NAACP is suing to stop the implementation of a voter-ID requirement for the upcoming election cycle.

    You may recall that the solid majority of North Carolina voters approved a constitutional amendment last fall requiring voter ID. The NAACP's argument is that because prior legislative elections occurred under district maps subsequently challenged on Voting Rights Act grounds, the resulting GOP majorities in the General Assembly did not really represent the voters. By placing voter ID on the ballot in 2018, they exercised legislative authority that they did not lawfully possess, or so goes the argument.

    In his brief, Cooper endorsed the argument, calling the Republican-led legislature "illegitimate." Although he and the plaintiffs have tried to limit the scope to constitutional amendments, in an attempt to avoid their argument's obvious absurdity, logic won't cooperate. If the General Assembly has been unlawfully constituted for years, why has Cooper signed so many bills coming over from the legislature? Why has he engaged in budget negotiations with illegitimate legislative leaders? Do all acts of a legislature vanish into the legal netherworld if a court subsequently finds fault with districts or some other aspect of the electoral process?

    At least with constitutional amendments, the people themselves have the ultimate say. An unlawfully constituted General Assembly cannot amend the constitution unless voters agree. But it could enact purportedly illegitimate budgets and laws.

    Heeding the most progressive Furies of his party, Cooper has put himself in a position of declaring that a popular vote of the people to enact voter ID is a violation of democratic principle. He's not the fella North Carolinians thought they were electing in 2016.

    John Hood (@JohnHoodNC) is chairman of the John Locke Foundation and appears on "NC SPIN," broadcast statewide Fridays at 7:30 p.m. and Sundays at 12:30 p.m. on UNC-TV.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Constitutional Experts Agree: Common Cause v. Lewis Will Wind up in State Supreme Court Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics The Purely Imaginary ‘Rightward Transformation’ in Higher Education


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview

HbAD1

If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government
Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top