The Politicization of University Schools of Education: The Long March through the Education Schools

Latest Polls (view all)

Under the cover of Covid, and now in the shadow of the infamous Election Irregularities of that fated 2020 presidential election, with current emerging alleged election fraud in Nevada and Pennsylvania inconveniently slipping into the public discourse, there is proved a colluded ongoing Election Interference in the nomination of the Republican candidate, the likes of which has never occurred in our Constitutional Republic's history, albeit, the question remains: Do you support the plain-sight Election Interference of the Democratic Socialist party, employing its minions in their Propagandistic Media, and their Two Tiered Justice System?

98.98% No, I do not support Election Interference; I am a patriot unto our Constitution.

1.02% Yes, I do support Election Interference; the alternative, Donald Trump, to this mentally diminished president is far worse.

0% "What, me worry" if elections are rigged?

Click Here to Vote
98 Vote(s)

View all Polls

The Politicization of University Schools of Education: The Long March through the Education Schools

Published: Monday, March 11th, 2019 @ 4:15 am
By: James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal ( More Entries )

Publisher's note: The James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal is a nonprofit institute dedicated to improving higher education in North Carolina and the nation. Located in Raleigh, North Carolina, it has been an independent 501(c)(3) organization since 2003. It was known as the John W. Pope Center for Higher Education Policy until early January 2017.

The author of this post is Jay Schalin.

    Education schools have become one of the most politicized corners of academia, and The Politicization of University Schools of Education: The Long March through the Education Schools reveals the extent of that politicization using two approaches. One is historical and operates at the theoretical level, showing how education schools were ideological from the start and became more so over time.

    The second approach is empirical. Education school syllabi were obtained from three leading schools of education: the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the University of Michigan, and the University of Wisconsin at Madison. Recommended and assigned reading selections were quantified to discover the most popular authors.

    The results are unequivocal: the "long march" through the education schools has been successful; the most influential thinkers in our education schools are radicals who adhere to a collectivist, utopian vision.

    While the situation in schools of education may seem hopeless, reform - either through the advancement of alternative institutions or through the involvement of legislators and university trustees - is possible.

    Downloads

Go Back