Physician, Heal Thyself | Eastern North Carolina Now

The American relationship between government and those governed has reached a 50 year low.

ENCNow
     The American experience of a representative democracy is certainly not the most efficient political system devised by man, but it is the best attempt to balance out the needs of both individual liberty and societal progress. However, the current political and social milieu belies the strength afforded by our founders intention. We are currently heading down an internal path that is destructive in both intent and content.

    Please allow me to explain in more detail.

    The American relationship between government and those governed has reached a 50 year low. A recent study by the Pew Center suggested that 75%-80% of Americans do not trust the U.S. government to do what is right.

    What a surprise! Americans hate big, inefficient bureaucracy! Paradoxically, that same study suggested that the federal government needs more regulatory jurisdiction when it comes to the financial sector of our economy. So, we want freedom AND protection from an institution that we loathe. My understanding is that, indeed, we have always been this fickle.

    Balancing the nature and role of government in a free society today is the least of our worries. What is truly worrisome is the absence of constructive political discourse which helps us frame the issues of the day. The way I see it, there is no middle ground on any issue any more.

    Through our own desire to make sure our own narrow agenda is advanced in Washington, we elect officials who reflect that narrow agenda and have lost sight of the necessity and art of compromise in the political process. It has become very unfashionable to see another point of view; we’ve become a nation of narrow-minded, winner-take-all malcontents who will not even give the idea of consensus the time of day. The result of this political acrimony is legislative gridlock in Washington and a collective case of national animosity and alienation.

    Lets be clear about this: the founders loved open disagreements and the competition of ideas amongst people with the ability to be rational: the key word here is RATIONAL. One only needs to look at the recent gnashing of teeth over health care reform to understand that rational thought is truly an afterthought.

    Second, the expansion of our ability to gather and access information with the advent of the internet gives each of us a chance to truly explore any issue on any level to our hearts content. Unfortunately, more access to information does not necessarily translate into citizens becoming more enlightened. The rules of verifying information and analysis rely squarely on each of us and the outlets we trust. However, as in pre-internet days, too many people will dismiss information because it does not align with their own ideological preconceptions. We are, to put it bluntly, intellectually lazy and lack the desire to challenge information given to us.

    Both of the above assessments have led to a predictable result when it comes to the makeup of our elected representatives. There is no compromise, only intransigence and ideology. There is no win-win negotiating, only gamesmanship. There is no big picture thinking, only the next election cycle.

    Ladies and gentlemen, we have developed a petty, mean streak when it comes to the art of governance. Any legislative or political outcome that does not fit our own world view must be the spawn of satan himself. We have lost our ability to accept differences of opinion and the only way to reverse course is to ask, very politely, at the next forum of candidates - local or otherwise - “I’d like you to give me an example where you compromised your ideals for the sake of moving a piece of legislation for the greater good.” If we cannot ask that of candidates that are begging for our vote, then we must accept the outcome of continued stalemates in the halls of Congress.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments

( May 1st, 2010 @ 9:16 pm )
 
There's lots to agree with....hell....there's lots period! I love the article! Ill have a response very soon!
( May 1st, 2010 @ 12:13 pm )
 
Hey Mike, What do you think about the new kid's retort to your "out of left field" commentary? Diane certainly has a certain measure of flow once she gets on a roll. In fact, she expresses my sentiments, quite eloquently, as well. Do you think you and Ms. "Spit and Fire" can find any common ground?
( April 29th, 2010 @ 4:00 am )
 
The power of the purse only goes so far due to the short term and fickle nature of the economic powerhouses in this country. It becomes even worse when the free market and government are in cahoots as well. I think you and I would agree that an enlightened American electorate is an oxymoron.
( April 28th, 2010 @ 8:52 am )
 
The truth: The pivate sector should be mistrusted. But, we have the "power of the purse," and the stock market, where we can "vote with our feet," and sell the stock. Government by definition is a monopoly and we have no power over it, save the election day for an enlightened electorate.
( April 28th, 2010 @ 3:22 am )
 
This is probably the number one reason I like you; both as a politician and a person! My question to you is this: if we are so quick to distrust the government (which I agree with you 100%), shouldn't we be wary of the free market system for the same reason?
( April 27th, 2010 @ 11:25 pm )
 
The reason people do not trust a majority within government is the truth / fiction vs. reality quotient. Most politicians trust that the majority of the public can only digest so much truth, so they mete out a measure of truth with their fiction. I'm different. I can only speak my truth.



School board votes unanimously to continue to spend rather than cut as other systems are doing Out of Left Field, Op-Ed & Politics Understanding your thinking


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government

HbAD1

Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.
Smartmatic was at center of voting machine controversy in US 2020 election
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Shooter was identified on the roof with a weapon with enough time to stop him...but, officers were not prepared to access the roof

HbAD2

 
Back to Top