No Special Election, but Court Orders New N.C. Legislative Districts by Sept. 1 | Eastern North Carolina Now

A three-judge federal panel has denied a request to force a special N.C. legislative election before regularly scheduled 2018 contests

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This post was created by the staff for the Carolina Journal, John Hood Publisher.

    A three-judge federal panel has denied a request to force a special N.C. legislative election before regularly scheduled 2018 contests. But the judges have ordered state lawmakers to prepare new election maps by Sept. 1.

    The judges issued their 11-page ruling Monday evening. It offers neither legislators nor their critics a complete victory.

    Legislative leaders had argued against special elections, either later this year or in early 2018. The federal judges sided with legislators on that point without explaining why. "As will be explained more fully in a forthcoming memorandum opinion, we deny Plaintiffs' request for a special election," the order states.

    While plaintiffs in the case failed to secure their special election, they were able to convince judges to order a relatively brief timeline for drawing new election maps for N.C. House and Senate seats. Plaintiffs wanted new maps finished by Aug. 11. Legislators countered with a proposal for new maps by November.

    Instead, judges opted for Sept. 1. "This is twice as long as the General Assembly has when a state court orders redistricting, is over a year after this Court ordered the legislature to redistrict, and is almost three months after the Supreme Court upheld this Court's order finding the existing districts to be unconstitutional racial gerrymanders," the order explains.

    The judges will extend the deadline to Sept. 15 if lawmakers meet a preliminary deadline set three weeks from now.

    The court order marks the latest development in the Covington v. North Carolina case. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously upheld the three-judge panel's earlier ruling in the case that 28 legislative districts must be thrown out as examples of illegal racial gerrymandering. The Supreme Court also chided the panel for an earlier order demanding special elections without offering adequate justification.

    House and Senate redistricting committees are scheduled to meet Friday.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




A Knowledge Gap Surrounding a Hot Redistricting Term Carolina Journal, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Bill Protecting Free Speech Becomes Law, Without the Governor's Signature


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The existing School Board should vote to put this project on hold until new Board is seated
At least one person was shot and killed during an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump on Saturday at a political rally in Pennsylvania in which the suspected gunman was also “neutralized,” according to the U.S. Secret Service.
As everyone now knows, the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling to grant presidents immunity for "official acts" has given Donald Trump unlimited power to do literally anything he wants with zero consequences whatsoever.
President Joe Biden formally rejected on Monday a bill in Congress that would require individuals to show proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote in elections for federal office.
Watch and be sensitive to the events which will possibly unfold in the coming days.

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
majority of board member are rubberstamps for liberal superintendant
like the old Soviet Union, Biden put DEI political officers in the military
ssick perverts running Deere sponsored homosexual event for 3 year olds

HbAD2

appoints new pro-cnesorship White House official
Those with access to President Joe Biden behind closed doors say that his condition is deteriorating at an accelerated rate

HbAD3

 
Back to Top