Opponents of the Pantego Wind Farm ask Commissioners for Wind Ordinance | Eastern North Carolina Now

   At the Beaufort County Commissioner's General Meeting, December 12, 2011, there existed a contest of ideas and ideals as to whether the wind farm, designated for proposed construction in an area north of Pantego, and southwest of the Pocosin Lakes Wildlife Refuge, should have the right to be constructed. It appears that at the heart of this matter are the proponents of wind energy as a capitalist solution to our energy needs, and the proponents to protect the abundant waterfowl that use the natural watershed of that proposed construction site that, in part, drains into the Pungo River and Pantego Creek - both in eastern Beaufort County.

   The proposed location will be the home of 49 wind powered turbines owned and operated by Invergy. Their home office is in Chicago, Illinois.

   To wit, representatives of a developing opposition group to the project spoke in favor of Beaufort County Commissioners developing a restrictive wind ordinance, which would limit or stop construction of the project. Opposition representatives, Doris Morris, who spoke in the public Comments period of the meeting, and Larry Hodges, who spoke in the Agenda Items period, both represented that the constructed wind powered turbines would compromise the Atlantic Waterfowl Flyway to an extent that would seriously jeopardize the habitat of the Pocosin Lakes Wildlife Refuge.

   Additionally, Ms. Morris expressed that the indigenous bat population would be diminished due to the constant movement of the blade rotors. Mr. Hodges continued that a good number of these wind turbines, 14,000 by his collected data, have ceased operation and stand idle. Secondly, Mr. Hodges offered that his data suggested that wind energy at the proposed wind farm, was marginal at best. Both expressed a need for Beaufort County Commissioners to enact a restrictive Wind Ordinance.

   Invergy Representative April Montgomery countered that Invergy's proposed construction phase would need 160,000,000.00 in construction spending, and would create an estimated 100 construction jobs. After construction, Invergy would need 5 permanent jobs to continue operations post construction. Furthermore, Ms. Montgomery stressed that ongoing annual operation expenses would be around 1,000,000.00.

   Ms. Montgomery explained that before Invergy expends this level of funding, they will record data to qualify the site in terms of both environmental concerns and the project's ultimate economic viability.

   After her presentation, I asked two questions - the first concern: Mr. Hodges's allegation that 14,000 of these wind turbines were idled. Ms. Montgomery answered that she was not aware of this data, so I asked Mr. Hodges, could this 14,000 number be accurate, to wit, he replied, "the 14,000 number was in the low range of my collected data, but represents all sizes of windmills."

   After the meeting, I continued to press Ms. Montgomery, when she offered, "You know, now that I've had an opportunity to think about it, I do not believe that there are a total of 14,000 wind powered turbines currently in the United States."

   Also during the construct of the general meeting Ms. Montgomery added, "Currently, all of Invergy's Wind Powered Turbines, unless idled for maintenance, are in operation."

   I also stated that Wind Power Impresario T. Boone Pickens has called the corridor from North Texas through North Dakota the "Saudi Arabia of Wind", and then I asked: Why not build your wind farms there?

   Ms. Montgomery: "The power grid in the Midwest is presently inadequate, so Invergy is looking to build where the power grid is not overloaded, like here in Beaufort County."

   Commentary:

   If one wishes to make the argument that eastern North Carolina is an inefficient location for Wind Powered Turbines, and they should, instead, be located in the corridor coined as the "Saudi Arabia of Wind," blame President Barack Obama and a Democrat Congress for ramming through an 800,000,000,000.00 stimulus package that was predominately a slush fund for Democrats, rather than building out essential United States infrastructure.

   If one believes that this Pantego Wind Farm is a potential environmental nightmare, in regards to waterfowl habitat, then seek redress with the regulatory agencies. They are many, and normally side with those more concerned with the environment than commerce.

   I say this with the firm belief that North Carolina county commissioners do not have the tools to properly stop undesirable commercial enterprises by virtue of overlay regulation. Our governmental infrastructure is non regulatory on this level, and we should not construct new additional layers of weaker authority as an overlay to existing stronger regulatory authorities.

   I would only favor a Wind Ordinance if it was enacted only to govern ongoing concerns, not to limit their development.

   I will, however, vote NO for any public assistance for this project, and since there is public opposition to this project, I would strenuously encourage my fellow Beaufort County Commissioners to vote NO as well on any corporate welfare for Invergy.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Beaufort County General Meeting: December, 2011. County Commissioners, Government, Governing Beaufort County Washington City Council plans for the future


HbAD0

Latest Governing Beaufort County

North Carolina's Rate Bureau has requested for 2024 an annual increase of 42.2%, whereby North Carolina's Insurance Commissioner Mike Causey has exhibited a great willingness to take a firm stand against such an exorbitant increase.
The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services today released a draft of its 2024-25 Olmstead Plan designed to assist people with disabilities to reside in and experience the full benefit of inclusive communities.
Members of the North Carolina Rural Health Association (NCRHA) visited Washington, D.C., on Feb. 14, 2024, to meet with elected officials and advocate for policies to improve access to care in rural areas.
I reckon one could always argue that ignorance rests in the eyes of the beholder, but, I'm not taking that bet ... not in these Orwellian times, when so few of our fellow travelers know so little of what is real, and far too much of what otherwise might be terminally fake.
There were numerous local professional and educational opportunities showcased on Wednesday at the Beaufort County Job and Resource Fair.
Please click on the link to access the agenda for the Monday, February 12, 2024 City Council meeting

HbAD1

The Beaufort County Board of Commissioners will hold a special called meeting with the Beaufort County Board of Education on Wednesday, February 7, 2024 at 3:30 PM at the Professional Development Center located at 845 Pierce St, Washington, NC.
The Beaufort County Board of Commissioners will meet at 121 W. 3rd St, Washington, during the following times for their annual Planning Retreat:
The Beaufort County Board of Commissioners will meet in regular session on Monday, February 5, 2024 at 5:30 PM in the boardroom located at 136 W. 2nd St, Washington, NC
This morning’s update included very minor changes to timing of today’s forecasted impacts.
This afternoon’s update from the National Weather Service (NWS) included another increase in the forecasted wind conditions for Beaufort County.
This morning’s update from the National Weather Service (NWS) included an elevated threat of severe weather, to include the possibility of tornados, as well as an increase in the forecasted wind conditions.

HbAD2

Our office is continuing to monitor an approaching cold front that is expected to bring high winds, elevated water levels, rain and the potential for severe storms to our area Tuesday and Wednesday. Forecast details for Beaufort County can be found below.

HbAD3

 
Back to Top