|
Stan Deatherage said:
( December 13th, 2016 @ 9:25 pm )
Serpentine: Falk and Arkin; great image.
|
Diane had an excellnt article on that very subject. Here is the lnk for a country that might have outgrown its diapers.
beaufortcountynow.com |
1991: Soviet Union is now 15 independent countries. Maybe USA should do the same.
|
With the possible exception for the role of Sheldon "Shelly" Kornpett. the dentist who learned how to serpantine. Thanks for the softball over the plate.
beaufortcountynow.com |
Great movie.
Have you ever noticed that Alan Arkin usually played the Russian, or an American with a Russian name, like Yossarian, in his early films, like "Catch 22"? |
Russia had honored all treaties and the USA has broken all, according to THE UNTOLD HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES. Correct Oliver Stone if he is wrong.
|
In a separate news item, the FBI applied the 'HILLARY CLAUSE' to the latest discussion about the Russian hacking.
"The disagreement between some Republicans and Democrats on Russia's INTENTIONS (caps added by me) in hacking the election rests partially on the lack of agreement between intelligence agencies and the FBI about the conclusiveness of the evidence, officials explained this weekend." Click below to see how 'NOT' to hold a RATIONAL discussion about this subject on CNN. The article is based on LEAKED information so you will have to be careful about the FAKE NEWS aspect of this whole mess. www.cnn.com |
I'm getting some private push back from this article, so perhaps some clarification is in order. I am not giving the Russians a pass on this. note quote.
"I am in favor of a full investigation into the hacking and if we can find out who and how it was done, there should be grave consequences both for individuals and countries that participated in the hacking. " What I am saying is essentially that this issue is being used to attempt to delegitimize the election results. The people voted per the procedure set up in the constitution and the electoral college have or soon will chose Trump as the winner based on the law in effect. Regardless if certain voters were uninformed, ill informed or just plain duped about what they believed is beyond the point. The votes were counted per the current laws and a decision was rendered by the public. It may not be in the constitution but I think we have the privileged if not the right to be ignorant or wrong about our beliefs. The law does not guarantee a perfect election, it guarantees a fair election and that should be investigated. If we discounted vote based on errors of judgement, we would never have had several of the Presidents we had on both sides of the spectrum. NO EXTRA CREDIT GIVEN FOR THIS LESSON. |
Racial Justice Act Claims Receive Hearing in Charlotte Court | Views from the Right Seat, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics | Carolina Lawmakers Become Leaders |