Permitless Concealed Carry Bill Filed in NC House | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: This post, by Matt Caulder, was originally published in Civitas's online edition.

    The post can also be found on www.nccapitolconnection.com.

    A bill filed in the House last week, if approved, will open up the state to Constitutional carry, or being able to carry a concealed handgun without a Concealed Handgun Permit, if you meet certain criteria.

    Now the criteria to conceal under the bill would be essentially the same as that to get a concealed carry permit.

    The oldest state to allow concealed carry of a firearm without a permit is Vermont, which has never placed any limits on a person's ability to bear arms in a discreet manner since its inception in 1791.

    Over the last 25 years another nine states have opened the doors to Constitutional carry including Montana in 1991, Alaska in 2003, Texas in 2007, Arizona in 2010, Wyoming in 2011, Arkansas in 2013, Kansas in 2015 and most recently Idaho and West Virginia.

    And a common thread between all of these states is that, since the inception of Constitutional carry, not one of them has had blood running through the streets as many opposed to permitless carry predicted.

    HB1148 would not only allow U.S. citizens, that otherwise meet the criteria under the law, to conceal a handgun in the state but would also put forth a referendum to the voters in November about whether or not they want to delete a sentence from the state Constitution that says, "Nothing herein shall justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons, or prevent the General Assembly from enacting penal statutes against that practice."

    This portion of the North Carolina Declaration of Rights, Article I of the state Constitution, is the tail-end of the state recognition of the right to bear arms, which reads in full as follows, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; and, as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they shall not be maintained, and the military shall be kept under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power. Nothing herein shall justify the practice of carrying concealed weapons, or prevent the General Assembly from enacting penal statutes against that practice."

    The section in question however does not harken back to 1776 when the first North Carolina Constitution was passed, or even 1868 when the second Constitution was drafted.

    No, it was added into the Constitution in 1971 during the recodification of the state Constitution, a full 24 years before the state passed concealed carry permit laws.

    Keep that in mind as pundits and political actors espouse the wisdom of our forefathers in banning concealed carry in the first place over the coming days.

    The bill would also outline that property owners, specifically owners or controllers of properties that charge admission or serve alcohol would still be able to deny concealed carry in their businesses, but with the exception that it would not apply to a large group of privileged government workers including law enforcement officers, some courthouse employees, penal system employees and justice system employees, as well as some military personnel.

    The law already makes exceptions for many of those listed in the bill but would expand the net to catch more people within government.

    The timing of the filing coincides with a federal appellate court decision in California ruling that said "the right of a member of the general public to carry a concealed firearm in public is not, and never has been, protected by the Second Amendment."

    The 7-4 decision ruled that any "prohibition or restriction a state may choose to impose on concealed carry" is permissible, which would include as it says, prohibition on concealed carry.

    In a time when courts are rewriting the Second Amendment to pave the way for banning the carry of firearms, especially in states like California where open carry is illegal, it is nice to see some taking a stand to expand carry rights in this state.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




UNC-Chapel Hill's Economics Program Lacks Historical Perspective Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics AG Roy Cooper's Job Performance Under Fire For Poor Defense Of Critical Sex Offender Law


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

The Missouri Senate approved a constitutional amendment to ban non-U.S. citizens from voting and also ban ranked-choice voting.
Democrats prosecuting political opponets just like foreign dictrators do
populist / nationalist / sovereigntist right are kingmakers for new government
18 year old boy who thinks he is girl planned to shoot up elementary school in Maryland
Biden assault on democracy continues to build as he ramps up dictatorship
One would think that the former Attorney General would have known better

HbAD1

illegal alien "asylum seeker" migrants are a crime wave on both sides of the Atlantic
UNC board committee votes unanimously to end DEI in UNC system
Police in the nation’s capital are not stopping illegal aliens who are driving around without license plates, according to a new report.
Davidaon County student suspended for using correct legal term for those in country illegally

HbAD2

Lawmakers and privacy experts on both sides of the political spectrum are sounding the alarm on a provision in a spy powers reform bill that one senator described as one of the “most terrifying expansions of government surveillance” in history

HbAD3

 
Back to Top