Bill Could Be Win-Win For NC | Eastern North Carolina Now

Imagine a piece of state legislation that could both lower your utility bill and make North Carolina more competitive for jobs.

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This post, by Brian Balfour, was originally published in the Issues section of Civitas's online edition.

    Imagine a piece of state legislation that could both lower your utility bill and make North Carolina more competitive for jobs.

    House Bill 681, the NC Energy Ratepayers Protection Act, does just that.

    In 2008, North Carolina legislators enacted a renewable energy portfolio standard. Simply put, these standards require that a certain percentage of energy provided by NC utilities come from so-called renewable sources. Solar, wind, hydropower and even biomass are considered "renewable" sources of energy under this law.

    This law has forced major energy providers such as Duke Energy to purchase more expensive and inefficient energy sources to pass along to consumers. Also being passed along to consumers is a higher energy bill.

    And higher energy bills not only force residential ratepayers — especially low-income households — to dig deeper to pay their bills, but also impose higher costs on businesses and make North Carolina less competitive for jobs. Business surveys find energy costs to consistently rank highly among a company's decision of where to locate or expand.

    Indeed, a recent study conducted by Strata Policy in conjunction with Utah State University's Institute of Political Economy concluded that North Carolina's renewables mandate has cost the state 24,000 jobs and $14.4 billion in personal income. Higher energy bills on commercial and industrial ratepayers discouraged investment and job creation, resulting in household income being roughly $3,900 lower by 2013 than it would have been absent the mandate.

    Moreover, the study estimated that residential ratepayers have been paying on average a total of $149 million more in utility bills thanks to the renewable portfolio. Such increased energy bills naturally impact low-income households the hardest, as they must spend a larger share of their monthly income on utility bills than do middle- and upper-income households.

    As bad as all that sounds, however, the actual impact of the renewable portfolio is even worse than the study indicates. The 2008 law stipulated that for the first several years, only 3 percent of energy comes from renewable sources. As of 2015, that amount doubles to 6 percent, and is scheduled to increase to 10 percent by 2018 and again to 12.5 percent by 2021.

    Make no mistake, as the portfolio mandates rise, so too will energy bills and job loss.

    The NC Energy Ratepayers Protection Act would remove the mandate on utilities and allow them to provide ratepayers with the least-cost mix of energy available, be they conventional sources or "renewable" sources. Well-heeled special interests such as "Big Solar" will no longer have guaranteed customers for expensive sources of energy, and would have to compete on a cost basis with other energy sources on a level playing field.

    "This bill is focused solely on protecting the ratepayer. This is not a battle of renewable versus nonrenewable," said state Rep. Chris Millis, R-Pender.

    "If members want to mandate and subsidize higher power costs, then that's their prerogative. But I didn't come up here to Raleigh to underwrite a certain industry, and do it on the backs of the citizens I represent," Millis said. "To me it's absolutely egregious."

    The legislation would also honor energy contracts between suppliers and the utilities already in place until 2018, in order to hold harmless parties to such agreements.

    Opinion polling consistently finds that North Carolinians may like the idea of "renewable" energy in theory, but don't want to pay more for it, with nearly two-thirds of respondents to a Civitas poll stating they don't feel ratepayers should be forced to pay more.

    The mandate forcing North Carolina ratepayers to buy more expensive, unreliable sources of energy was a special interest giveaway from the start. North Carolina families and businesses have been paying a steep cost ever since in the form of higher energy bills and thousands of lost jobs.

    House Bill 681, the NC Energy Ratepayers Protection Act, will right this wrong and be a major benefit for all North Carolinians.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comment

( April 24th, 2015 @ 10:26 am )
 
I think this is a Senator who has his hands in the Koch Brothers pocket!!!

When our Legislature got conned into Fracking as if there is no danger to aquifers inland and rivers which feed into our Sounds, they were stupid. Now, the plans to possibly drill for oil in the Graveyard of the Atlantic beside our Outer Banks and near the Gulf Stream prove we are being raped for a resource long past its need --- with alternate sources available besides fossil fuels.

Sometimes the long term good far outweighs the short term skinflints of Conservatism. If we take outselves back to the cave for polluting this earth's atmosphere and causing rising oceans, then get your beach chair and put it just outsides Fayetteville in the Sand Hills --- which were once the beach of NC!



Conservatives and GREED Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics NC Case May Roil U.S. Religion Debate


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview

HbAD1

If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government
Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.

HbAD2


HbAD3

 
Back to Top