Good News About Asset Forfeiture, Continued | Eastern North Carolina Now

    Publisher's note: The author of this post is Jon Guze, who is the Director of Legal Studies for the John Locke Foundation.

    As I have previously explained, civil asset forfeiture is an obnoxious legal process that empowers law enforcement agencies to confiscate property they suspect has been used in, or derived from, criminal activity. Part of what makes this process so abhorrent is the fact that, because it is a civil action taken against the property itself, the owner of the property need not be convicted of, or even charged with, a crime. In previous newsletters, I have written about some on-going efforts to reform asset forfeiture policy at the federal level. Today I'm happy to report that similar efforts are underway in the states.

Republican Proposals in Oklahoma and Texas

    In its comprehensive report on civil asset forfeiture abuse, the Institute for Justice gave Oklahoma a "D" and described its forfeiture law as "terrible." So it was certainly good news when, in February, two Republican state senators filed a bill to replace Oklahoma's forfeiture law with a new system of "criminal forfeiture" under which forfeiture would only be authorized when the owner of the property had been convicted of a felony, and when the owner had knowingly used the property for, or derived it from, "the commission of the crime."

    IJ gave Texas's forfeiture law an even lower mark than Oklahoma's: a "D-." So it was arguably even better news when, in early March, a Republican state representative in Texas filed an almost identical bill entitled, "An act relating to repealing civil asset forfeiture and establishing criminal asset forfeiture in this state."

A "Bipartisan Push" in New Mexico

    In a piece that appeared on the Cato Institute's website, Adam Bates suggested that these Republican proposals were part of what he described as a "bipartisan push for justice reform." However, I was skeptical. I pointed out that the only example Bates offered of a Democratic contribution to the reform movement was the change in DOJ forfeiture policy that Eric Holder had announced in January. However, as Bates himself acknowledged, the changes announced by Holder are subject to many "exceptions and potential loopholes," and Loretta Lynch, Holder's presumptive successor, is an enthusiastic "advocate and practitioner of civil asset forfeiture."

    I'm delighted to admit, however, that subsequent events have shown that I was wrong and Bates was right. Just over a week ago, bipartisan majorities in both houses of the New Mexico state legislature approved a bill to eliminate civil asset forfeiture and replace it with a criminal forfeiture program similar to those that have been proposed in Oklahoma and Texas. Assuming Governor Martinez signs the bill, New Mexico will be the first state to renounce the odious practice of civil asset forfeiture. Let us hope that it does, and that many other states follow its example.

North Carolina Still Leads the Way

    Before leaving the topic of asset forfeiture, I can't resist pointing out that, while New Mexico may soon start setting a good example to other states by repealing its civil asset forfeiture laws, North Carolina is already setting an even better example by never having adopted such laws in the first place. (As I previously noted, "Under North Carolina state law, forfeiture is generally permitted only when the owner of the property in question has been charged with and convicted of a crime.")

    This is, I think, another instance of what I talked about last week — the fact that, thanks to the the good design of our institutions and the good sense of our people, North Carolina has generally avoided the kinds of predatory policing that have, in other states, blotted the records of law enforcement agencies and poisoned relations between those agencies and the public they are supposed to serve.

    Which is not to say we should be complacent. Thanks to the federal "equitable sharing" program, North Carolina hasn't managed to avoid the scourge of civil asset forfeiture completely. Nevertheless, when it comes to asset forfeiture — and to predatory policing more generally — a certain amount of pride and gratitude are certainly in order.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




Civitas Poll: Walker Leads Selected GOP Hopefuls John Locke Foundation Guest Editorial, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics The Medium And The Message


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Be careful what you wish for, you may get it
America needs to wake up and get its priorities right
Former President Donald Trump suggested this week that if he becomes president again, he might allow Prince Harry to be deported.
It's a New Year, which means it's time to make resolutions — even for prominent evangelical leaders. The Babylon Bee asked the following well-known figures in the faith what they hope to accomplish in 2024:
Vice President Kamala Harris will visit a Minnesota Planned Parenthood clinic, reportedly the first time a president or vice president has visited an abortion facility.
An eight-mile stretch of the Blue Ridge Parkway near Asheville has been temporarily closed due to a string of “human and bear interactions,” the National Parks Service announced.
University of Wisconsin tried to punish conservatives for the fact that liberals regularly commit crimes to silence opposition
most voters think EU officials not doing a good job on illegal immigration
Come from behind by GOP candidate is a blueprint to 2024

HbAD1

Biden spending and energy policies to blame
Tuberculosis carried by illegal invaders has already infected Texas cattle
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said this week that the only campaign promise President Joe Biden has delivered on as president is the complete dismantling of the U.S. southern border.
Hamas is reeling after losing two of their most cherished leaders on the same day: military commander Saleh al-Arouri, and Harvard President Claudine Gay.
President Joe Biden’s brother told the Internal Revenue Service that Hunter Biden told him he was in business with a “protege of President Xi,” referring to the leader of China, according to notes by an IRS investigator that were divulged during a congressional interview of Jim Biden.
Gov. Roy Cooper seeks a temporary restraining order to block a law changing the composition of the State Board of Elections.
X owner Elon Musk mocked a news segment from ABC News this week that promoted President Joe Biden’s talking points about the Democrat-led Senate’s failed border bill, which critics and many experts have said would make the situation on the border worse.
That’s the question Marguerite Roza of Georgetown University’s Edunomics Lab sought to answer in a recent webinar on the topic.

HbAD2

 
Back to Top