The State of the Union was More of a Pep Rally for Liberals | Eastern North Carolina Now

    If you were tuning in to discover the direction of your nation for the next year, you would have been sadly misinformed. The vast majority of the liberal initiatives proposed by Amateur Obama will be Dead on Arrival, since the Republicans hold large majorities in the Senate and House. The Amateur also promised to veto a number bills by the Republicans, many are bi-partisan, that they will be vetoed.

    Last night's State of the Union was nothing more that a public assembly for congressional and executive Liberals to embrace their ideals for big government, and the resultant redistribution of wealth, and the Democrat votes tht the money from other people buys them. At moments in the presidential address the most ardent Liberals in the audience were ecstatic.
2015 State of the Union Address: Above.

    I think House Ways and Means Committee chairman Paul Ryan described the address best: "What did you expect: It was a liberal speech from a liberal president?"

    Here below is the video of State of of the Union address and below that the transcript of the address:



Remarks by the President in State of the Union Address


    THE PRESIDENT: Madam Speaker, Vice President Biden, members of Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow Americans:

    Our Constitution declares that from time to time, the President shall give to Congress information about the state of our union. For 220 years, our leaders have fulfilled this duty. They've done so during periods of prosperity and tranquility. And they've done so in the midst of war and depression; at moments of great strife and great struggle.

    It's tempting to look back on these moments and assume that our progress was inevitable -- that America was always destined to succeed. But when the Union was turned back at Bull Run, and the Allies first landed at Omaha Beach, victory was very much in doubt. When the market crashed on Black Tuesday, and civil rights marchers were beaten on Bloody Sunday, the future was anything but certain. These were the times that tested the courage of our convictions, and the strength of our union. And despite all our divisions and disagreements, our hesitations and our fears, America prevailed because we chose to move forward as one nation, as one people.

    Again, we are tested. And again, we must answer history's call.

    One year ago, I took office amid two wars, an economy rocked by a severe recession, a financial system on the verge of collapse, and a government deeply in debt. Experts from across the political spectrum warned that if we did not act, we might face a second depression. So we acted -- immediately and aggressively. And one year later, the worst of the storm has passed.

    But the devastation remains. One in 10 Americans still cannot find work. Many businesses have shuttered. Home values have declined. Small towns and rural communities have been hit especially hard. And for those who'd already known poverty, life has become that much harder.

    This recession has also compounded the burdens that America's families have been dealing with for decades -- the burden of working harder and longer for less; of being unable to save enough to retire or help kids with college.

    So I know the anxieties that are out there right now. They're not new. These struggles are the reason I ran for President. These struggles are what I've witnessed for years in places like Elkhart, Indiana; Galesburg, Illinois. I hear about them in the letters that I read each night. The toughest to read are those written by children -- asking why they have to move from their home, asking when their mom or dad will be able to go back to work.

    For these Americans and so many others, change has not come fast enough. Some are frustrated; some are angry. They don't understand why it seems like bad behavior on Wall Street is rewarded, but hard work on Main Street isn't; or why Washington has been unable or unwilling to solve any of our problems. They're tired of the partisanship and the shouting and the pettiness. They know we can't afford it. Not now.

    So we face big and difficult challenges. And what the American people hope -- what they deserve -- is for all of us, Democrats and Republicans, to work through our differences; to overcome the numbing weight of our politics. For while the people who sent us here have different backgrounds, different stories, different beliefs, the anxieties they face are the same. The aspirations they hold are shared: a job that pays the bills; a chance to get ahead; most of all, the ability to give their children a better life.

    You know what else they share? They share a stubborn resilience in the face of adversity. After one of the most difficult years in our history, they remain busy building cars and teaching kids, starting businesses and going back to school. They're coaching Little League and helping their neighbors. One woman wrote to me and said, "We are strained but hopeful, struggling but encouraged."

    It's because of this spirit -- this great decency and great strength -- that I have never been more hopeful about America's future than I am tonight. (Applause.) Despite our hardships, our union is strong. We do not give up. We do not quit. We do not allow fear or division to break our spirit. In this new decade, it's time the American people get a government that matches their decency; that embodies their strength. (Applause.)

    And tonight, tonight I'd like to talk about how together we can deliver on that promise.

    It begins with our economy.

    Our most urgent task upon taking office was to shore up the same banks that helped cause this crisis. It was not easy to do. And if there's one thing that has unified Democrats and Republicans, and everybody in between, it's that we all hated the bank bailout. I hated it -- (applause.) I hated it. You hated it. It was about as popular as a root canal. (Laughter.)

    But when I ran for President, I promised I wouldn't just do what was popular -- I would do what was necessary. And if we had allowed the meltdown of the financial system, unemployment might be double what it is today. More businesses would certainly have closed. More homes would have surely been lost.

    So I supported the last administration's efforts to create the financial rescue program. And when we took that program over, we made it more transparent and more accountable. And as a result, the markets are now stabilized, and we've recovered most of the money we spent on the banks. (Applause.) Most but not all.

    To recover the rest, I've proposed a fee on the biggest banks. (Applause.) Now, I know Wall Street isn't keen on this idea. But if these firms can afford to hand out big bonuses again, they can afford a modest fee to pay back the taxpayers who rescued them in their time of need. (Applause.)

    Now, as we stabilized the financial system, we also took steps to get our economy growing again, save as many jobs as possible, and help Americans who had become unemployed.

    That's why we extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 18 million Americans; made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families who get their coverage through COBRA; and passed 25 different tax cuts.

    Now, let me repeat: We cut taxes. We cut taxes for 95 percent of working families. (Applause.) We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for parents trying to care for their children. We cut taxes for 8 million Americans paying for college. (Applause.)

    I thought I'd get some applause on that one. (Laughter and applause.)

    As a result, millions of Americans had more to spend on gas and food and other necessities, all of which helped businesses keep more workers. And we haven't raised income taxes by a single dime on a single person. Not a single dime. (Applause.)

    Because of the steps we took, there are about two million Americans working right now who would otherwise be unemployed. (Applause.) Two hundred thousand work in construction and clean energy; 300,000 are teachers and other education workers. Tens of thousands are cops, firefighters, correctional officers, first responders. (Applause.) And we're on track to add another one and a half million jobs to this total by the end of the year.

    The plan that has made all of this possible, from the tax cuts to the jobs, is the Recovery Act. (Applause.) That's right -- the Recovery Act, also known as the stimulus bill. (Applause.) Economists on the left and the right say this bill has helped save jobs and avert disaster. But you don't have to take their word for it. Talk to the small business in Phoenix that will triple its workforce because of the Recovery Act. Talk to the window manufacturer in Philadelphia who said he used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act, until he had to add two more work shifts just because of the business it created. Talk to the single teacher raising two kids who was told by her principal in the last week of school that because of the Recovery Act, she wouldn't be laid off after all.

    There are stories like this all across America. And after two years of recession, the economy is growing again. Retirement funds have started to gain back some of their value. Businesses are beginning to invest again, and slowly some are starting to hire again.

    But I realize that for every success story, there are other stories, of men and women who wake up with the anguish of not knowing where their next paycheck will come from; who send out resumes week after week and hear nothing in response. That is why jobs must be our number-one focus in 2010, and that's why I'm calling for a new jobs bill tonight. (Applause.)

    Now, the true engine of job creation in this country will always be America's businesses. (Applause.) But government can create the conditions necessary for businesses to expand and hire more workers.

    We should start where most new jobs do -- in small businesses, companies that begin when -- (applause) -- companies that begin when an entrepreneur -- when an entrepreneur takes a chance on a dream, or a worker decides it's time she became her own boss. Through sheer grit and determination, these companies have weathered the recession and they're ready to grow. But when you talk to small businessowners in places like Allentown, Pennsylvania, or Elyria, Ohio, you find out that even though banks on Wall Street are lending again, they're mostly lending to bigger companies. Financing remains difficult for small businessowners across the country, even those that are making a profit.

    So tonight, I'm proposing that we take $30 billion of the money Wall Street banks have repaid and use it to help community banks give small businesses the credit they need to stay afloat. (Applause.) I'm also proposing a new small business tax credit

    -- one that will go to over one million small businesses who hire new workers or raise wages. (Applause.) While we're at it, let's also eliminate all capital gains taxes on small business investment, and provide a tax incentive for all large businesses and all small businesses to invest in new plants and equipment. (Applause.)

    Next, we can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. (Applause.) From the first railroads to the Interstate Highway System, our nation has always been built to compete. There's no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.

    Tomorrow, I'll visit Tampa, Florida, where workers will soon break ground on a new high-speed railroad funded by the Recovery Act. (Applause.) There are projects like that all across this country that will create jobs and help move our nation's goods, services, and information. (Applause.)

    We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities -- (applause) -- and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy-efficient, which supports clean energy jobs. (Applause.) And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it is time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas, and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America. (Applause.)

    Now, the House has passed a jobs bill that includes some of these steps. (Applause.) As the first order of business this year, I urge the Senate to do the same, and I know they will. (Applause.) They will. (Applause.) People are out of work. They're hurting. They need our help. And I want a jobs bill on my desk without delay. (Applause.)

    But the truth is, these steps won't make up for the seven million jobs that we've lost over the last two years. The only way to move to full employment is to lay a new foundation for long-term economic growth, and finally address the problems that America's families have confronted for years.

    We can't afford another so-called economic "expansion" like the one from the last decade -- what some call the "lost decade" -- where jobs grew more slowly than during any prior expansion; where the income of the average American household declined while the cost of health care and tuition reached record highs; where prosperity was built on a housing bubble and financial speculation.

    From the day I took office, I've been told that addressing our larger challenges is too ambitious; such an effort would be too contentious. I've been told that our political system is too gridlocked, and that we should just put things on hold for a while.

    For those who make these claims, I have one simple question: How long should we wait? How long should America put its future on hold? (Applause.)

    You see, Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse. Meanwhile, China is not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany is not waiting. India is not waiting. These nations -- they're not standing still. These nations aren't playing for second place. They're putting more emphasis on math and science. They're rebuilding their infrastructure. They're making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs. Well, I do not accept second place for the United States of America. (Applause.)

    As hard as it may be, as uncomfortable and contentious as the debates may become, it's time to get serious about fixing the problems that are hampering our growth.

    Now, one place to start is serious financial reform. Look, I am not interested in punishing banks. I'm interested in protecting our economy. A strong, healthy financial market makes it possible for businesses to access credit and create new jobs. It channels the savings of families into investments that raise incomes. But that can only happen if we guard against the same recklessness that nearly brought down our entire economy.

    We need to make sure consumers and middle-class families have the information they need to make financial decisions. (Applause.) We can't allow financial institutions, including those that take your deposits, to take risks that threaten the whole economy.

    Now, the House has already passed financial reform with many of these changes. (Applause.) And the lobbyists are trying to kill it. But we cannot let them win this fight. (Applause.) And if the bill that ends up on my desk does not meet the test of real reform, I will send it back until we get it right. We've got to get it right. (Applause.)

    Next, we need to encourage American innovation. Last year, we made the largest investment in basic research funding in history -- (applause) -- an investment that could lead to the world's cheapest solar cells or treatment that kills cancer cells but leaves healthy ones untouched. And no area is more ripe for such innovation than energy. You can see the results of last year's investments in clean energy -- in the North Carolina company that will create 1,200 jobs nationwide helping to make advanced batteries; or in the California business that will put a thousand people to work making solar panels.

    But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. And that means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. (Applause.) It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. (Applause.) It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies. (Applause.) And, yes, it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America. (Applause.)

    I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. (Applause.) And this year I'm eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate. (Applause.)

    I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy. I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But here's the thing -- even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy-efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future -- because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation. (Applause.)

Go Back



Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )



Comments

( January 23rd, 2015 @ 7:07 am )
 
I am hearing the braying of a 2-2X4 mule not wanting to obey my SC Democrat farmer Granddaddy's words ~~~ he would take you out behind the woodpile and put a cotton hoe in your hand for a day of good thinking and sweating, buddy!
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 5:42 pm )
 
I reckon that is some high minded Liberal qualitative analysis, you have copied and pasted here, about how Liberals feel their way through governing; however, I still don't see how any of these copied and pasted words have any quantifiable relation to what I initially comment on:

[This is where Liberals can't understand government in a Free Market America.

Liberals believe in government involved at every level, even in the private sector, where the free market should only determine the outcome.

One thing is for sure: Liberals don't believe in involving the federal government in protecting our citizens from a determined evil. That is actually its top responsibility.]

And as far as going to a dictionary to learn about governing at all levels of government, I'm pretty much way past that rudimentary level. In fact, I know many real Conservatives, who have never served at any level, that know far more than that dictionary level mumbo-jumbo.
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 3:34 pm )
 
If you had bothered to consult the Dictionary, here is what you get, Stan ~~~
adjective
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism, especially the freedom of the individual and governmental guarantees of individual rights and liberties.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, especially with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or relating to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
9. characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts: a liberal donor.
10. given freely or abundantly; generous: a liberal donation.
11. not strict or rigorous; free; not literal: a liberal interpretation of a rule.
12. of, relating to, or based on the liberal arts.
13. of, relating to, or befitting a freeman.
noun
14. a person of liberal principles or views, especially in politics or religion.
15. (often initial capital letter) a member of a liberal party in politics, especially of the Liberal party in Great Britain.

Now run your reasoning before us again, if you please!
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 9:56 am )
 
This ain't college.

And government cannot fix everything, and shouldn't try. The best government should ever do is provide basic services and protect its citizens from evil doers.

When you stray far away from those precepts you are a Liberal. That is just the way it works.
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 9:04 am )
 
Hey, bud~~~you gave me the title of "from the middle."

I accept "Independent" better. A guy with several degrees starting with Emory is hardly one without much sense. I was top 10% at Clarkston High School outside Atlanta and did well with the challenge to analyze things from Emory, SEBTS, Insurance, Series 6 exam, etc.

For your information I was Emory Debate Team qualified and did right well in any argument. They, by the way, required you know all sides of any debate . . .
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 8:58 am )
 
Go back and read what you write. You are a classic Liberal.

You call me a Conservative, and you would be right. It is written in my words. To be a true Conservative, it forces me to know stuff, a lot of stuff, but not within the context of the buzz words you throw around; different stuff, deeper stuff.

You see, true Liberals will never understand Conservatives, yet some of us well understand you. It's the nature of being a true Conservative.
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 8:48 am )
 
There you going again ~~~ calling me a Liberal when I am "from the middle" and agree over curtailing welfare spending in excess to a 5th generation of tit suckers . . .

Please watch those labels more carefully, Stan
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 8:11 am )
 
The State of the Union only involves the federal government, and this year, it only involves the executive branch of the federal government.

It will be different, at least for the next two years, and you, Liberals, who can't fathom what the federal government is charges to do, much less what state and local governments are charged to do, are going to have a Hell of a time until Liberal cavalry returns.

You guys might asseble get a greater grouping of buzz words, although, you did assemble a grand group in your previous comment.
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 7:52 am )
 
Stan, old buddy, I watched the same speech, but see it far different. Your comment above is audacious in its Conservatism: "One thing is for sure: Liberals don't believe in involving the federal government in protecting our citizens from a determined evil. That is actually its top responsibility."

There are only 2 reasons for a good government: (1) To do thing collectively for the citizens who pay the taxes, (2) Protect citizens from abject abuse of money and control as well as using our taxes to aggrandize corporate income.

I saw the main thrust: Return the Middle Class to a place of opportunity in the dream of "All men created equal . . ." This nation has taken a poor track of making a person like Dick Cheney rich over war contracts---from a war he invented. The Koch Brothers did not invest so much money in the Tillis campaign for no ulterior motive of Fracking and (soon) drilling offshore of the Outer Banks for oil with the high risks of severe winter storms on the Graveyard of the Atlantic.

Do we want that kind of local risk to our Sounds and Aquaculture????
( January 22nd, 2015 @ 12:05 am )
 
This is where Liberals can't understand government in a Free Market America.

Liberals believe in government involved at every level, even in the private sector, where the free market should only determine the outcome.

One thing is for sure: Liberals don't believe in involving the federal government in protecting our citizens from a determined evil. That is actually its top responsibility.



McCrory Makes High-Profile Push for Historic Credit Statewide, Government, State and Federal Coastal Low Friday Night/Saturday morning

HbAD0

 
Back to Top