Waste Of The Week: Welcome Centers | Eastern North Carolina Now

North Carolina's so-called Welcome Centers are indeed a welcome site for full-bladdered motorists in need of a pit stop. And the available maps and tourism brochures may come in handy for curious travelers as well.

ENCNow
    Publisher's note: This post, by Brian Balfour, was originally published in the Waste of the Week section of Civitas's online edition.

    North Carolina's so-called Welcome Centers are indeed a welcome site for full-bladdered motorists in need of a pit stop. And the available maps and tourism brochures may come in handy for curious travelers as well.

    But are these facilities a "core function" of state government? Should taxpayers be forced to pay $1.9 million annually to subsidize them?

    North Carolina features nine "Welcome Centers" located on interstate highways near state lines. The centers are home to "clean, modern facilities" that offer visitors abundant copies of "the state's Official North Carolina Travel Guide, the Department of Transportation's official state map, and other marketing publications exclusively about North Carolina."

    Most of us already knew that. But did you know that each center also has on staff "professional, nationally-certified travel counselors" ready to book room reservations at no charge?

    Also part of the nearly $2 million annual cost to taxpayers for the Welcome Centers is more than $35,000 worth of cell phone and email services for the 44.25 full-time equivalent staffers, along with $5,940 for cable TV service.

    There really is no need for government to be involved in welcome centers. Any traveler is familiar with highway rest stops that combine gas stations with restaurants that also feature bathrooms, maps and informational brochures. Private enterprises can more than adequately meet the needs of motorists in need of a break.

    Instead of continuing to force taxpayers to hand over nearly $2 million every year to fund the welcome centers, the state should sell the facilities to private interests. In many cases, the facilities will go from gobbling up taxpayers' money to contributing tax revenue to the state. And for those worried about the "commercialization" of welcome centers, private charities can raise money to buy the facilities and preserve them in their present state if they so choose.

    Welcome Centers are no concern of state government, and clearly would not be funded if the state budget was "cut to the bone" as so many insist. Because running the centers forces taxpayers to pay for facilities that should instead be supported by voluntary, private support, taxpayer funding for the state's nine Welcome Centers is this week's Waste of the Week.
Go Back


Leave a Guest Comment

Your Name or Alias
Your Email Address ( your email address will not be published)
Enter Your Comment ( no code or urls allowed, text only please )




They’re BAAAAAAACK. But SO are WE. Civitas Institute, Editorials, Op-Ed & Politics Burr Favored In Duel


HbAD0

Latest Op-Ed & Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, admitted that he cheated on his first wife with the couple’s babysitter after a report was published on Saturday that said the marriage ended after he got the babysitter pregnant.
A black Georgia activist became the center of attention at a rally for former president Donald Trump on Saturday when she riled the crowd in support of Trump and how his policies benefit black Americans.
Former President has been indicted by a federal judge in Pennsylvania for inciting an assassination attempt that nearly killed him.
A federal judge ruled on Monday that Google has a monopoly over general search engine services, siding with the Justice Department and more than two dozen states that sued the tech company, alleging antitrust violations.
3 debates and Twitter interview
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Check it out and see if you think this is an exhibit of Open Government

HbAD1

Acting U.S. Secret Service Director Ronald Rowe told reporters on Friday that his agency was fully responsible for the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump last month and that the agency “should have had eyes” on the roof where 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.
Smartmatic was at center of voting machine controversy in US 2020 election
If we vote the way we have always voted we will get the kind of government we have always gotten
Shooter was identified on the roof with a weapon with enough time to stop him...but, officers were not prepared to access the roof

HbAD2

 
Back to Top